Weighted Voting: Fresh Take

  • Define weighted voting and distinguish it from equal voting
  • Apply the Banzhaf power index and the Shapley-Shubik power Index to assess the relative power of individual voters in a weighted voting situation

Weighted Voting

The Main Idea

Weighted Voting: A system where each vote has a weight attached to it, often proportional to ownership stakes or representation.

Player: An individual or entity casting a vote in the election, often notated as [latex]P_1,P_2,P_3,...,P_N[/latex] where [latex]N[/latex] is the total number of voters.

Weight: The value assigned to each player, representing their voting power.

Quota: The minimum weight needed for a proposal to be approved.

Shorthand Representation: A compact way to represent a weighted voting system, e.g., [latex][q: w_1, w_2, w_3, ... , w_N][/latex]

Below are important things to consider when thinking about weighted voting.

  • Understanding Weight: In a corporate setting, your weight might be directly tied to the number of shares you own. More shares mean more weight.
  • Quota Constraints: The quota must be more than half of the total number of votes but can’t be larger than the total number of votes. This ensures a decisive outcome.

A Look at Power

The Main Idea

In weighted voting systems, players can have different types of power, such as being a dictator, having veto power, or being a dummy. A dictator is a player whose weight alone can meet the quota, making them the ultimate decision-maker. Veto power means a player’s support is essential for reaching the quota, but they can’t do it alone. A dummyis a player whose vote doesn’t influence the outcome. Coalitions are groups of players voting the same way, and a player is critical in a coalition if their departure changes the coalition’s status from winning to losing.

Below are some key terms.

  • Dictator: If a player’s weight is equal to or greater than the quota, they are a dictator. They can pass or block any proposal single-handedly.
  • Veto Power: A player has veto power if their support is necessary for the quota to be reached. They can’t pass a proposal alone but can block one.
  • Dummy: A player is a dummy if their vote is never essential for a group to reach the quota. Their presence or absence doesn’t affect the outcome.
  • Coalition: A coalition is a group of players voting the same way. It’s a winning coalition if it has enough weight to meet the quota.
  • Critical Players: A player is critical in a coalition if their departure changes it from a winning coalition to a losing one.

For more information on these terms and the basics of weighted voting, watch the following video.

You can view the transcript for “Introduction to Weighted Voting” here (opens in new window).

Calculating Power- Banzhaf Power Index

The Main Idea

The Banzhaf Power Index is a fascinating tool that quantifies the influence of individual players in a weighted voting system. It’s not just about the number of votes you have; it’s about how crucial your votes are to forming winning coalitions. In essence, this index tells us how often a player’s vote is a game-changer in reaching a decision.

Below are important things to consider when thinking about the Banzhaf Power Index.

  • Listing Winning Coalitions: The first step in calculating the Banzhaf Power Index is to list all the possible winning coalitions. A coalition is a group of players who together have enough votes to win.
  • Identifying Critical Players: In each coalition, figure out which players are “critical,” meaning the coalition would lose without their votes.
  • Counting Critical Appearances: Tally up how many times each player is critical across all coalitions.
  • Calculating the Index: Convert the counts to fractions or percentages by dividing the number of times a player is critical by the total number of times any player is critical.
Find the Banzhaf power index for the voting system [latex][8:6,3,2][/latex].

Find the Banzhaf power index for the voting system [latex][36: 20, 17, 16, 3][/latex].

For more information on the Banzhaf power index, watch the following video.

You can view the transcript for “Weighted Voting: The Banzhaf Power Index” here (opens in new window).

Calculating Power- Shapley-Shubik Power Index

The Main Idea

In this section, we’re diving into the Shapley-Shubik Power Index, a method that gives us a nuanced understanding of power dynamics in weighted voting systems. Unlike traditional coalitions where the order of players doesn’t matter, this index considers sequential coalitions—the order in which players join a coalition. The key player in these coalitions is the pivotal player, the one who turns a losing coalition into a winning one. The index is calculated by listing all sequential coalitions, identifying the pivotal player in each, and then converting these counts into fractions or decimals.

Below are important things to consider when thinking about the Shapley-Shubik Power Index.

  • Sequential Coalition: A list of players in the order they joined the coalition. Notated with angle brackets like [latex]< P_2,P_1,P_3>[/latex]
  • Pivotal Player: The player who changes the status of a coalition from losing to winning. There can only be one pivotal player in any sequential coalition.
  • Factorial ([latex]N![/latex]): The product of all positive whole numbers up to [latex]N[/latex]. It gives the total number of sequential coalitions for [latex]N[/latex] players.
Find the Shapley-Shubik power index for the weighted voting system [latex][36: 20, 17, 15][/latex].

For more information on the Shapley-Shubik power index, watch the following video.

You can view the transcript for “Weighted Voting: The Shapley-Shubik Power Index” here (opens in new window).