Approval Voting
Up until now, we’ve been considering voting methods that require ranking of candidates on a preference ballot. There is another method of voting that can be more appropriate in some decision making scenarios.
approval voting
With approval voting, the ballot asks you to mark all choices that you find acceptable. The results are tallied, and the option with the most approval is the winner.
Let’s take a look at an example.
[latex]30[/latex] | [latex]10[/latex] | [latex]15[/latex] | [latex]20[/latex] | [latex]15[/latex] | [latex]5[/latex] | [latex]5[/latex] | |
Seattle | X | X | X | X | |||
Tacoma | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Puyallup | X | X | X | X | |||
Olympia | X | X | X |
What’s Wrong with Approval Voting?
Approval voting can very easily violate the majority criterion. Let’s explore this through an example.
[latex]80[/latex] | [latex]15[/latex] | [latex]5[/latex] | |
1st choice | A | B | C |
2nd choice | B | C | B |
3rd choice | C | A | A |
Clearly A is the majority winner. Now suppose that this election was held using approval voting, and every voter marked approval of their top two candidates. A would receive approval from [latex]80[/latex] voters B would receive approval from [latex]100[/latex] voters C would receive approval from [latex]20[/latex] voters B would be the winner. Some argue that Approval Voting tends to vote the least disliked choice, rather than the most liked candidate.
Additionally, approval voting is susceptible to strategic insincere voting, in which a voter does not vote their true preference to try to increase the chances of their choice winning.