{"id":454,"date":"2023-03-02T20:16:59","date_gmt":"2023-03-02T20:16:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/chapter\/6-2-4-learn-it-choice-blindness\/"},"modified":"2025-11-14T16:39:22","modified_gmt":"2025-11-14T16:39:22","slug":"6-2-4-learn-it-choice-blindness","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/chapter\/6-2-4-learn-it-choice-blindness\/","title":{"raw":"Pitfalls to Problem Solving: Learn It 4\u2014Choice Blindness","rendered":"Pitfalls to Problem Solving: Learn It 4\u2014Choice Blindness"},"content":{"raw":"<h2>Two Variables: Time and Similarity<\/h2>\r\n<p data-start=\"196\" data-end=\"368\">Johansson and Hall\u2019s 2005 study explored <strong data-start=\"237\" data-end=\"244\">why<\/strong> people fail to notice when a chosen option is secretly switched. They focused on two variables that might affect detection:<\/p>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_5012\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"501\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23162353\/image11.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-5012 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23162353\/image11.png\" alt=\"Two sets of images. One shows incredibly similar faces of caucasian women, while the next pair shows dissimilar female faces.\" width=\"501\" height=\"197\" \/><\/a> <strong>Figure 1<\/strong>.\u00a0Johansson and Hall wanted to know if people were more likely to notice a similar or dissimilar image when shown a picture they did not choose.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<p data-start=\"370\" data-end=\"421\">1. How much time participants had to choose<\/p>\r\n<p data-start=\"423\" data-end=\"484\">Participants were assigned to one of three timing conditions:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"488\" data-end=\"517\">2 seconds (very rushed)<\/li>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"520\" data-end=\"553\">5 seconds (slightly rushed)<\/li>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"556\" data-end=\"588\">Unlimited time (free choice)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p data-start=\"590\" data-end=\"758\">If you had more time to inspect the faces, would you be <em data-start=\"646\" data-end=\"652\">more<\/em> likely to notice if you were handed the wrong one? That seems intuitive\u2014but the study tested it directly.<\/p>\r\n<p data-start=\"765\" data-end=\"806\">2. How similar the two faces were<\/p>\r\n<p data-start=\"808\" data-end=\"838\">Each pair of faces was either:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"842\" data-end=\"880\">Similar (very alike in features)<\/li>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"883\" data-end=\"925\">Dissimilar (more noticeably different)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p data-start=\"927\" data-end=\"1036\">You might predict that if the faces are very different, the swap would be obvious. But is that actually true?<\/p>\r\n<h2>Results<\/h2>\r\n<p>With three time conditions and two similarity conditions, the researchers created <strong data-start=\"1158\" data-end=\"1182\">six total conditions<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n<p>If we put the two manipulated variables (time and similarity) together, that gives us six conditions:<\/p>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_5013\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"512\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23165302\/unnamed.png\"><img class=\"wp-image-5013 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23165302\/unnamed.png\" alt=\"Six conditions with variance in two categories: Similarity of two faces, and time to choose. The six conditions are as follows: 2 seconds to choose similar faces, 2 seconds to choose dissimilar faces, 5 seconds to choose similar faces, 5 seconds to choose dissimilar faces, unlimited time to choose similar faces, unlimited time to choose dissimilar faces.\" width=\"512\" height=\"226\" \/><\/a> <strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. The six conditions of the experiment show that people were shown either similar or dissimilar faces, or given various amounts of time.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">In the figure below, adjust the bars to fit your predictions about how often people would notice the picture switch. Higher bars mean people noticed that the cards had been switched. <br \/>\r\n<br \/>\r\nLower bars mean that people made one choice and didn\u2019t notice when they were given the wrong picture. This isn\u2019t easy because you need to take into account the two variables: (1) the amount of time looking at the pictures before your choice and (2) the similarity of the faces in the pictures.<center><iframe src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/choice_blindness_bars.html\" width=\"830\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/center>[reveal-answer q=\"389129\"]Click here to see what <em>most<\/em> people expect the results to be.[\/reveal-answer]<br \/>\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"389129\"]Most people make predictions that put the red bars lowest, the purple bars in the middle, and the green bars highest. This supports the idea that the more time you have to look at the pictures, the more likely you are to notice that the picture you have chosen is not the one the experimenter gave you.\r\n\r\n<p>People also expect that the switch will be more noticeable if the faces are dissimilar. For example, if we look at the green bars with unlimited time, it makes sense that people will generally notice when the faces have been switched on them, and this is much greater when the two faces are very different (dissimilar condition) than when they are similar (similar condition).<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170040\/similarvsdissimilar1.png\"><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-5031 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170040\/similarvsdissimilar1.png\" alt=\"Typical responses showing what people will think about how many will notice that the pictures are switched. When given 2 seconds, maybe 18% will notice which similar faces are shown, but 20% would notice dissimilar faces. Given five seconds, 40% would identify switched similar faces and 50% switched dissimilar faces. With unlimited time, 70% would notice similar faces and 90% dissimilar faces.\" width=\"759\" height=\"463\" \/><\/a><\/p>\r\n<p>Most people find it hard to believe that lots of people will be tricked by the switch in faces, even if the experimenter has good magician skills. So, what did happen?<\/p>\r\n<p>[\/hidden-answer]<\/p>\r\n<p>[reveal-answer q=\"415570\"]HERE are the actual results from the study.[\/reveal-answer]<br \/>\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"415570\"]<\/p>\r\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170114\/final-results.png\"><img class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5032 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170114\/final-results.png\" alt=\"Results showing the percentage of participants who noticed the wrong face in the experiment. Given 2 seconds, 10% notice on similar faces and 11% noticed on dissimilar faces; given 5 seconds 15% noticed similar faces and 17% noticed dissimilar, and given unlimited time, 25% noticed the change in both similar and dissimilar faces.\" width=\"768\" height=\"461\" \/><\/a><\/p>\r\n<p>First, people generally did not notice the change in faces. Overall, participants in fewer than 20% of the trials noticed any of the card switches. Most participants simply did not realize that the faces had been switched, and many were either very surprised when they were told what had happened or they simply didn\u2019t believe the experimenters.<\/p>\r\n<p>There was an effect of time. The red bars (2 seconds to choose) are lower than the purple bars (5 seconds to choose), and the purple bars are lower than the green bars (unlimited time to choose), but the differences are fairly modest. The bigger surprise was the LACK of difference between the similar and dissimilar faces. In all three time conditions, there was no significant difference\u2014barely a measurable difference--between the similar and dissimilar faces conditions.[footnote]The results are more complex than the figure suggests. The data shown above are limited to first detections of the switch in pictures. After people notice that there has been a switch, they tend to be a bit suspicious and they are more vigilant about noticing changes. If all trials are taken into account, the data are still similar to these, but not quite as pretty. See the original paper for all the details.[\/footnote]<\/p>\r\n<p>[\/hidden-answer]<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<h2>What Do These Results Tell Us?<\/h2>\r\n<p data-start=\"3778\" data-end=\"3859\">These findings deepen\u2014but do not fully answer\u2014the puzzle of <strong data-start=\"3838\" data-end=\"3858\">choice blindness<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n<h3 data-start=\"3861\" data-end=\"3883\"><strong data-start=\"3865\" data-end=\"3883\">Key takeaways:<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"3885\" data-end=\"4012\">\r\n<p data-start=\"3887\" data-end=\"4012\"><strong data-start=\"3887\" data-end=\"3924\">Similarity isn\u2019t the main factor.<\/strong><br data-start=\"3924\" data-end=\"3927\" \/>\r\nEven when faces were very different, most people still failed to notice the switch.<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"4014\" data-end=\"4150\">\r\n<p data-start=\"4016\" data-end=\"4150\"><strong data-start=\"4016\" data-end=\"4053\">Time helps, but not dramatically.<\/strong><br data-start=\"4053\" data-end=\"4056\" \/>\r\nHaving unlimited time raised detection to about 25%, but did not eliminate choice blindness.<\/p>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"4152\" data-end=\"4368\">\r\n<p data-start=\"4154\" data-end=\"4228\"><strong data-start=\"4154\" data-end=\"4198\">The process behind detection is unclear.<\/strong><br data-start=\"4198\" data-end=\"4201\" \/>\r\nExtra time might improve:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"4233\" data-end=\"4262\">memory for the chosen face,<\/li>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"4267\" data-end=\"4303\">attention to specific features, or<\/li>\r\n\t<li data-start=\"4308\" data-end=\"4368\">the richness of the reasons participants mentally rehearsed.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h3 data-start=\"4459\" data-end=\"4478\"><strong data-start=\"4463\" data-end=\"4476\">In short:<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n<p data-start=\"4370\" data-end=\"4457\">Researchers still don\u2019t know exactly which cognitive process drives improved detection.<\/p>\r\n<p data-start=\"4479\" data-end=\"4666\">Choice blindness is surprisingly robust. Even under favorable conditions\u2014big differences between faces and unlimited time\u2014many people confidently explain choices they never actually made.<\/p>","rendered":"<h2>Two Variables: Time and Similarity<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"196\" data-end=\"368\">Johansson and Hall\u2019s 2005 study explored <strong data-start=\"237\" data-end=\"244\">why<\/strong> people fail to notice when a chosen option is secretly switched. They focused on two variables that might affect detection:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5012\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5012\" style=\"width: 501px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23162353\/image11.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5012 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23162353\/image11.png\" alt=\"Two sets of images. One shows incredibly similar faces of caucasian women, while the next pair shows dissimilar female faces.\" width=\"501\" height=\"197\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5012\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 1<\/strong>.\u00a0Johansson and Hall wanted to know if people were more likely to notice a similar or dissimilar image when shown a picture they did not choose.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p data-start=\"370\" data-end=\"421\">1. How much time participants had to choose<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"423\" data-end=\"484\">Participants were assigned to one of three timing conditions:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li data-start=\"488\" data-end=\"517\">2 seconds (very rushed)<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"520\" data-end=\"553\">5 seconds (slightly rushed)<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"556\" data-end=\"588\">Unlimited time (free choice)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-start=\"590\" data-end=\"758\">If you had more time to inspect the faces, would you be <em data-start=\"646\" data-end=\"652\">more<\/em> likely to notice if you were handed the wrong one? That seems intuitive\u2014but the study tested it directly.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"765\" data-end=\"806\">2. How similar the two faces were<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"808\" data-end=\"838\">Each pair of faces was either:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li data-start=\"842\" data-end=\"880\">Similar (very alike in features)<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"883\" data-end=\"925\">Dissimilar (more noticeably different)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p data-start=\"927\" data-end=\"1036\">You might predict that if the faces are very different, the swap would be obvious. But is that actually true?<\/p>\n<h2>Results<\/h2>\n<p>With three time conditions and two similarity conditions, the researchers created <strong data-start=\"1158\" data-end=\"1182\">six total conditions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>If we put the two manipulated variables (time and similarity) together, that gives us six conditions:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5013\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5013\" style=\"width: 512px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23165302\/unnamed.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5013 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/23165302\/unnamed.png\" alt=\"Six conditions with variance in two categories: Similarity of two faces, and time to choose. The six conditions are as follows: 2 seconds to choose similar faces, 2 seconds to choose dissimilar faces, 5 seconds to choose similar faces, 5 seconds to choose dissimilar faces, unlimited time to choose similar faces, unlimited time to choose dissimilar faces.\" width=\"512\" height=\"226\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5013\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. The six conditions of the experiment show that people were shown either similar or dissimilar faces, or given various amounts of time.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">In the figure below, adjust the bars to fit your predictions about how often people would notice the picture switch. Higher bars mean people noticed that the cards had been switched. <\/p>\n<p>Lower bars mean that people made one choice and didn\u2019t notice when they were given the wrong picture. This isn\u2019t easy because you need to take into account the two variables: (1) the amount of time looking at the pictures before your choice and (2) the similarity of the faces in the pictures.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/choice_blindness_bars.html\" width=\"830\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><button class=\"show-answer show-answer-button collapsed\" data-target=\"q389129\">Click here to see what <em>most<\/em> people expect the results to be.<\/button><\/p>\n<div id=\"q389129\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\">Most people make predictions that put the red bars lowest, the purple bars in the middle, and the green bars highest. This supports the idea that the more time you have to look at the pictures, the more likely you are to notice that the picture you have chosen is not the one the experimenter gave you.<\/p>\n<p>People also expect that the switch will be more noticeable if the faces are dissimilar. For example, if we look at the green bars with unlimited time, it makes sense that people will generally notice when the faces have been switched on them, and this is much greater when the two faces are very different (dissimilar condition) than when they are similar (similar condition).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170040\/similarvsdissimilar1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-5031 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170040\/similarvsdissimilar1.png\" alt=\"Typical responses showing what people will think about how many will notice that the pictures are switched. When given 2 seconds, maybe 18% will notice which similar faces are shown, but 20% would notice dissimilar faces. Given five seconds, 40% would identify switched similar faces and 50% switched dissimilar faces. With unlimited time, 70% would notice similar faces and 90% dissimilar faces.\" width=\"759\" height=\"463\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Most people find it hard to believe that lots of people will be tricked by the switch in faces, even if the experimenter has good magician skills. So, what did happen?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><button class=\"show-answer show-answer-button collapsed\" data-target=\"q415570\">HERE are the actual results from the study.<\/button><\/p>\n<div id=\"q415570\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170114\/final-results.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5032 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/24170114\/final-results.png\" alt=\"Results showing the percentage of participants who noticed the wrong face in the experiment. Given 2 seconds, 10% notice on similar faces and 11% noticed on dissimilar faces; given 5 seconds 15% noticed similar faces and 17% noticed dissimilar, and given unlimited time, 25% noticed the change in both similar and dissimilar faces.\" width=\"768\" height=\"461\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>First, people generally did not notice the change in faces. Overall, participants in fewer than 20% of the trials noticed any of the card switches. Most participants simply did not realize that the faces had been switched, and many were either very surprised when they were told what had happened or they simply didn\u2019t believe the experimenters.<\/p>\n<p>There was an effect of time. The red bars (2 seconds to choose) are lower than the purple bars (5 seconds to choose), and the purple bars are lower than the green bars (unlimited time to choose), but the differences are fairly modest. The bigger surprise was the LACK of difference between the similar and dissimilar faces. In all three time conditions, there was no significant difference\u2014barely a measurable difference&#8211;between the similar and dissimilar faces conditions.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"The results are more complex than the figure suggests. The data shown above are limited to first detections of the switch in pictures. After people notice that there has been a switch, they tend to be a bit suspicious and they are more vigilant about noticing changes. If all trials are taken into account, the data are still similar to these, but not quite as pretty. See the original paper for all the details.\" id=\"return-footnote-454-1\" href=\"#footnote-454-1\" aria-label=\"Footnote 1\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<h2>What Do These Results Tell Us?<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"3778\" data-end=\"3859\">These findings deepen\u2014but do not fully answer\u2014the puzzle of <strong data-start=\"3838\" data-end=\"3858\">choice blindness<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h3 data-start=\"3861\" data-end=\"3883\"><strong data-start=\"3865\" data-end=\"3883\">Key takeaways:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li data-start=\"3885\" data-end=\"4012\">\n<p data-start=\"3887\" data-end=\"4012\"><strong data-start=\"3887\" data-end=\"3924\">Similarity isn\u2019t the main factor.<\/strong><br data-start=\"3924\" data-end=\"3927\" \/><br \/>\nEven when faces were very different, most people still failed to notice the switch.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"4014\" data-end=\"4150\">\n<p data-start=\"4016\" data-end=\"4150\"><strong data-start=\"4016\" data-end=\"4053\">Time helps, but not dramatically.<\/strong><br data-start=\"4053\" data-end=\"4056\" \/><br \/>\nHaving unlimited time raised detection to about 25%, but did not eliminate choice blindness.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"4152\" data-end=\"4368\">\n<p data-start=\"4154\" data-end=\"4228\"><strong data-start=\"4154\" data-end=\"4198\">The process behind detection is unclear.<\/strong><br data-start=\"4198\" data-end=\"4201\" \/><br \/>\nExtra time might improve:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li data-start=\"4233\" data-end=\"4262\">memory for the chosen face,<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"4267\" data-end=\"4303\">attention to specific features, or<\/li>\n<li data-start=\"4308\" data-end=\"4368\">the richness of the reasons participants mentally rehearsed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 data-start=\"4459\" data-end=\"4478\"><strong data-start=\"4463\" data-end=\"4476\">In short:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"4370\" data-end=\"4457\">Researchers still don\u2019t know exactly which cognitive process drives improved detection.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"4479\" data-end=\"4666\">Choice blindness is surprisingly robust. Even under favorable conditions\u2014big differences between faces and unlimited time\u2014many people confidently explain choices they never actually made.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"before-footnotes clear\" \/><div class=\"footnotes\"><ol><li id=\"footnote-454-1\">The results are more complex than the figure suggests. The data shown above are limited to first detections of the switch in pictures. After people notice that there has been a switch, they tend to be a bit suspicious and they are more vigilant about noticing changes. If all trials are taken into account, the data are still similar to these, but not quite as pretty. See the original paper for all the details. <a href=\"#return-footnote-454-1\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 1\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":20,"menu_order":13,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Psychology in Real Life: Choice Blindness\",\"author\":\"Patrick Carroll for Lumen Learning\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"part":441,"module-header":"learn_it","content_attributions":[{"type":"cc","description":"Psychology in Real Life: Choice Blindness","author":"Patrick Carroll for Lumen Learning","organization":"","url":"","project":"","license":"cc-by","license_terms":""}],"internal_book_links":[],"video_content":null,"cc_video_embed_content":{"cc_scripts":"","media_targets":[]},"try_it_collection":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/454"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/454\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7211,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/454\/revisions\/7211"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/441"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/454\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=454"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=454"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}