{"id":1321,"date":"2023-03-31T17:38:45","date_gmt":"2023-03-31T17:38:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/chapter\/psychology-in-real-life-habits\/"},"modified":"2024-04-17T15:03:41","modified_gmt":"2024-04-17T15:03:41","slug":"psychology-in-real-life-habits","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/chapter\/psychology-in-real-life-habits\/","title":{"raw":"Healthy Habits: Learn It 2\u2014Psych in Real Life: Habits","rendered":"Healthy Habits: Learn It 2\u2014Psych in Real Life: Habits"},"content":{"raw":"<h2>Studying Habits by Changing Them<\/h2>\r\n<p>An important insight about habits is that they are activated by triggers in the environment. These triggers can be people or places, events or the time of day. The important idea is that we have learned to respond to something outside of us (i.e., the trigger) with a specific behavior (the habit). Let's look at a set of studies by Wendy Wood, David Neal, and their colleagues. This is just one of many studies of habits that these and other researchers have conducted, but it will give you an idea of how we can learn more about psychological processes by manipulating the details of a common event to see how people\u2019s behavior changes.<\/p>\r\n<h3>The Popcorn Study<\/h3>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_5248\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"300\"]<img class=\"wp-image-5248 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/02203557\/popcorn-in-box_800-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Popcorn in a popcorn holder.\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" \/> <strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. Are you a habitual popcorn eater?[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<p>Movie theater attendance is on the decline in the United States, but going to the movies is still popular. Of course, we go to the theater to see the movie, but for many people the experience is just not complete without the right refreshments: popcorn, candy, and soft drinks. You may be too health-conscious to buy these snacks, but most movie theaters depend on their concession stands to stay open.[footnote]According to research reported in Stanford Business, 20% of theater revenue comes from food sales, but a whopping 40% of profits come from food. They suggest that the high price of these snacks helps keep ticket prices down. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gsb.stanford.edu\/insights\/why-does-movie-popcorn-cost-so-much\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.gsb.stanford.edu\/insights\/why-does-movie-popcorn-cost-so-much<\/a>[\/footnote] Eating popcorn in a movie theater is a great example of a habit: a behavior that is triggered by a particular setting\u2014the movie theater.<\/p>\r\n<p>In 2011, David Neal, Wendy Wood, and some of their students published a study in which they used the movie theater-popcorn connection to study habitual behaviors.[footnote]David T. Neal, Wendy Wood, Mengju Wu, &amp; David Kurlander (2011). The pull of the past: When do habits persist despite conflict with motives? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1428-1437.[\/footnote] They looked for evidence that movie theaters really do trigger eating popcorn. But checking out the validity of that claim was just the starting point for studying the popcorn habit.<\/p>\r\n<h4>The Setup<\/h4>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_5249\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"300\"]<img class=\"wp-image-5249 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/02203904\/Toyogeki-Movie_Toyooka002-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"The inside of a movie theater.\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" \/> <strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. Researchers set out to test whether students would eat more popcorn in a movie-theater room, like this one, or in a regular meeting room.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<p>The experiments were conducted on the campus of the University of Southern California (USC). The campus has a cinema that regularly shows films that are popular among students.[footnote]This study was conducted in 2011. Habits change as social conventions change, so we can\u2019t guarantee that the USC cinema is still a popular attraction on campus.[\/footnote] They recruited students and assigned them to one of two conditions:<\/p>\r\n<ol>\r\n\t<li>In the cinema condition, the students went into the theater before the regular movie started and they watched and rated movie trailers. The important thing to understand is that the setting looked, sounded, smelled, and felt like a movie theater (which, of course, it was).<\/li>\r\n\t<li>Other students were recruited to come, at the same time of day, to a meeting room near the movie theater. These students were asked to listen to watch and rate music videos. The music videos had been pretested to assure that they were as interesting and engaging as the movie trailers that the cinema group watched. For this meeting room condition, the room was as comfortable as the theater and the task was as engaging as the one in the theater, but the location did not look or sound, smell or feel like a movie theater. It was a meeting room.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<p>Next came the critical prop for this experiment: a full box of popcorn was given to each person, along with a cup of water. No one made a big deal about the popcorn, but (unknown to the participants) the main question was: how much popcorn would people eat?<\/p>\r\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">Where do you think the participants ate more popcorn: in the cinema or in the meeting room? Move the bars below to give your estimate of the percentage of the box of popcorn (this is the percentage number on the Y-axis) that was eaten\u2014on the average\u2014by the participants in each location.<center><iframe src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/habits1.html\" width=\"660\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/center>[reveal-answer q=\"358659\"]Click here to see the results.[\/reveal-answer]<br \/>\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"358659\"]<img class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5063 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29194401\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-2.43.02-PM-294x300.png\" alt=\"Bar graph showing that 60% of the popcorn was eaten in the cinema room as opposed to 30% in the meeting room.\" width=\"294\" height=\"300\" \/>[\/hidden-answer]<\/section>\r\n<p>The first question was the easy one. But we left out a crucial piece of information: half of the participants in each location had nice fresh popcorn, but the other half had rubbery, stale popcorn. Now, how much fresh or stale popcorn do you think participants ate in the two locations?<\/p>\r\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">Now adjust the bar graphs to give your estimate of the percentage of the box of popcorn that was eaten\u2014on the average\u2014by the participants in each location. Brown represents stale popcorn and yellow represents fresh popcorn.<center><iframe src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/habits2.html\" width=\"660\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/center>[reveal-answer q=\"196308\"]Click here to see the results.[\/reveal-answer]<br \/>\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"196308\"]\r\n\r\n<p><img class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5064 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29195155\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-2.51.10-PM-300x240.png\" alt=\"Bar graph results showing that cinema viewers ate 50% of the stale popcorn and ate 60% ate of the fresh popcorn. Participants in the meeting room ate 20% of the stale popcorn and 40% of the fresh popcorn.\" width=\"300\" height=\"240\" \/><\/p>\r\n<p>To interpret the results, look at the size of the difference between the brown (stale popcorn) bar and the yellow (fresh popcorn) bar. A bigger difference means that the participants were more influenced by the taste of the popcorn. A smaller difference means that the stale versus fresh popcorn didn\u2019t influence their behavior so much\u2014or, in other words, that habit was more powerful than taste. As you can see, in the cinema\u2014the habitual place to eat popcorn\u2014subjects not only ate more popcorn, but they were less influenced by the quality of the popcorn. This is exactly what you would expect if people are engaging in a learned behavior rather than responding to factors that generally influence how much we eat\u2014such as how good the food tastes.<\/p>\r\n<p>[\/hidden-answer]<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<p>Now perhaps the people in the cinema just didn\u2019t notice that the stale popcorn was stale. Fortunately, the experimenters anticipated that question, so they asked the students to rate the taste of the popcorn. Here is what they found:<\/p>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_5066\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"442\"]<img class=\"wp-image-5066\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29195926\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-2.58.25-PM.png\" alt=\"Results of the question, &quot;how much did you like the popcorn?&quot; on a seven point scale? In the cinema, stale popcorn tasters gave it a 2.6, and the fresh popcorn eaters gave it a 3.5. In the meeting room, stale-eaters gave it a 3, and fresh eaters gave it a 3.5.\" width=\"442\" height=\"297\" \/> <strong>Figure 3<\/strong>. Researchers found that students in both conditions rated the popcorn pretty low, and many students who didn't like the stale popcorn still ate it.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<p>There was no statistically significant difference in the ratings between the cinema and meeting room groups. But notice that, if anything, the cinema subjects rated the stale popcorn tasted as being slightly worse than the meeting room subjects did. The subjects in the cinema knew that the stale popcorn tasted bad, but they still ate it.<\/p>\r\n<p>Are we sure that habit had something to do with this behavior? The experimenters asked participants to rate the strength of their own habit of eating popcorn in movie theaters. Of course, some people didn\u2019t like popcorn much, while others wouldn\u2019t think of going to the movies and skipping the popcorn. The experimenters divided the participants into three groups, based on their ratings of the strength of their popcorn-at-the-movies habit. Here is what they found for the subjects in the cinema condition:<\/p>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_5067\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"381\"]<img class=\"wp-image-5067\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29200137\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-3.01.07-PM.png\" alt=\"Bar graph showing popcorn eating habit strength of weak, medium, or strong on the x-axis and the percentage of popcorn eaten on the y-axis. Those with weak habits ate 45% of the stale popcorn and 70% fresh. With medium habits, they ate 50% of the stale and 60% of the fresh. And those with strong habits ate 65% of the stale and 60% of the fresh.\" width=\"381\" height=\"295\" \/> <strong>Figure 4<\/strong>. This shows those with either weak, medium, or strong popcorn-eating habits, and how much they ate in the cinema condition. Those with weak popcorn habits still ate a lot of fresh popcorn (the most, even!), but they ate the least amount of stale popcorn.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<p>On average, the three groups ate about the same amount of popcorn. But\u2014once again\u2014notice the difference between the brown (stale) and yellow (fresh) bars. Participants with weak movie-popcorn habits ate a lot of the fresh popcorn, but not much of the stale popcorn. The stale-fresh difference was smaller for the medium movie-popcorn habit group. And, for the students with a strong movie-popcorn habit, there was no significant difference in the amount of fresh versus stale popcorn consumed (with slightly more stale popcorn than fresh actually eaten!). The students with strong habits knew that the stale popcorn was nasty, but they still ate it as if it were fresh.<\/p>\r\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">What do you think happened in the meeting room? You already know that they ate less popcorn in general, and that they ate less stale popcorn than fresh. But did habit strength affect them as much as it did for the folks in the cinema? Make your prediction using the bars below.<center><iframe src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/habits3.html\" width=\"830\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/center>[reveal-answer q=\"446133\"]Click here to see the results.[\/reveal-answer]<br \/>\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"446133\"]<img class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5069 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/30033103\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-10.30.32-PM-300x239.png\" alt=\"Bar graph showing the meeting room condition and habit strength. When the popcorn was stale, those with weak habits ate 15% of the stale popcorn and over 30% of the fresh. Those with medium habits ate 20% of the stale and nearly 40% of the fresh popcorn. Those with strong habits ate 25% of the stale and 45% of the fresh popcorn.\" width=\"300\" height=\"239\" \/>\r\n<p>Students with stronger cinema-popcorn habits did eat slightly more popcorn overall than those with weaker habits, but look at the DIFFERENCE between the two bars at each habit level. At all three habit strengths, participants ate about the same amount LESS stale popcorn than fresh. This is the sort of thing that people do when they are aware of the food they are eating. If something tastes good, you eat it. If something tastes bad, you leave it in the box.<\/p>\r\n<p>[\/hidden-answer]<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<p>These results are consistent with the idea that the cinema environment triggers the popcorn-eating habit. The habitual popcorn eater consumes popcorn in the triggering environment (here, the cinema setting) even if the popcorn is not worth eating. In a different environment (the meeting room) the habit is not triggered, so popcorn consumption is much more determined by its quality, regardless of the strength of that habit in the cinema setting.<\/p>","rendered":"<h2>Studying Habits by Changing Them<\/h2>\n<p>An important insight about habits is that they are activated by triggers in the environment. These triggers can be people or places, events or the time of day. The important idea is that we have learned to respond to something outside of us (i.e., the trigger) with a specific behavior (the habit). Let&#8217;s look at a set of studies by Wendy Wood, David Neal, and their colleagues. This is just one of many studies of habits that these and other researchers have conducted, but it will give you an idea of how we can learn more about psychological processes by manipulating the details of a common event to see how people\u2019s behavior changes.<\/p>\n<h3>The Popcorn Study<\/h3>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5248\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5248\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5248 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/02203557\/popcorn-in-box_800-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Popcorn in a popcorn holder.\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5248\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. Are you a habitual popcorn eater?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Movie theater attendance is on the decline in the United States, but going to the movies is still popular. Of course, we go to the theater to see the movie, but for many people the experience is just not complete without the right refreshments: popcorn, candy, and soft drinks. You may be too health-conscious to buy these snacks, but most movie theaters depend on their concession stands to stay open.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"According to research reported in Stanford Business, 20% of theater revenue comes from food sales, but a whopping 40% of profits come from food. They suggest that the high price of these snacks helps keep ticket prices down. https:\/\/www.gsb.stanford.edu\/insights\/why-does-movie-popcorn-cost-so-much\" id=\"return-footnote-1321-1\" href=\"#footnote-1321-1\" aria-label=\"Footnote 1\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[1]<\/sup><\/a> Eating popcorn in a movie theater is a great example of a habit: a behavior that is triggered by a particular setting\u2014the movie theater.<\/p>\n<p>In 2011, David Neal, Wendy Wood, and some of their students published a study in which they used the movie theater-popcorn connection to study habitual behaviors.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"David T. Neal, Wendy Wood, Mengju Wu, &amp; David Kurlander (2011). The pull of the past: When do habits persist despite conflict with motives? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1428-1437.\" id=\"return-footnote-1321-2\" href=\"#footnote-1321-2\" aria-label=\"Footnote 2\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[2]<\/sup><\/a> They looked for evidence that movie theaters really do trigger eating popcorn. But checking out the validity of that claim was just the starting point for studying the popcorn habit.<\/p>\n<h4>The Setup<\/h4>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5249\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5249\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5249 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/02203904\/Toyogeki-Movie_Toyooka002-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"The inside of a movie theater.\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5249\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 2<\/strong>. Researchers set out to test whether students would eat more popcorn in a movie-theater room, like this one, or in a regular meeting room.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The experiments were conducted on the campus of the University of Southern California (USC). The campus has a cinema that regularly shows films that are popular among students.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"This study was conducted in 2011. Habits change as social conventions change, so we can\u2019t guarantee that the USC cinema is still a popular attraction on campus.\" id=\"return-footnote-1321-3\" href=\"#footnote-1321-3\" aria-label=\"Footnote 3\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[3]<\/sup><\/a> They recruited students and assigned them to one of two conditions:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>In the cinema condition, the students went into the theater before the regular movie started and they watched and rated movie trailers. The important thing to understand is that the setting looked, sounded, smelled, and felt like a movie theater (which, of course, it was).<\/li>\n<li>Other students were recruited to come, at the same time of day, to a meeting room near the movie theater. These students were asked to listen to watch and rate music videos. The music videos had been pretested to assure that they were as interesting and engaging as the movie trailers that the cinema group watched. For this meeting room condition, the room was as comfortable as the theater and the task was as engaging as the one in the theater, but the location did not look or sound, smell or feel like a movie theater. It was a meeting room.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Next came the critical prop for this experiment: a full box of popcorn was given to each person, along with a cup of water. No one made a big deal about the popcorn, but (unknown to the participants) the main question was: how much popcorn would people eat?<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">Where do you think the participants ate more popcorn: in the cinema or in the meeting room? Move the bars below to give your estimate of the percentage of the box of popcorn (this is the percentage number on the Y-axis) that was eaten\u2014on the average\u2014by the participants in each location.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/habits1.html\" width=\"660\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><button class=\"show-answer show-answer-button collapsed\" data-target=\"q358659\">Click here to see the results.<\/button><\/p>\n<div id=\"q358659\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5063 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29194401\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-2.43.02-PM-294x300.png\" alt=\"Bar graph showing that 60% of the popcorn was eaten in the cinema room as opposed to 30% in the meeting room.\" width=\"294\" height=\"300\" \/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p>The first question was the easy one. But we left out a crucial piece of information: half of the participants in each location had nice fresh popcorn, but the other half had rubbery, stale popcorn. Now, how much fresh or stale popcorn do you think participants ate in the two locations?<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">Now adjust the bar graphs to give your estimate of the percentage of the box of popcorn that was eaten\u2014on the average\u2014by the participants in each location. Brown represents stale popcorn and yellow represents fresh popcorn.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/habits2.html\" width=\"660\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><button class=\"show-answer show-answer-button collapsed\" data-target=\"q196308\">Click here to see the results.<\/button><\/p>\n<div id=\"q196308\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5064 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29195155\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-2.51.10-PM-300x240.png\" alt=\"Bar graph results showing that cinema viewers ate 50% of the stale popcorn and ate 60% ate of the fresh popcorn. Participants in the meeting room ate 20% of the stale popcorn and 40% of the fresh popcorn.\" width=\"300\" height=\"240\" \/><\/p>\n<p>To interpret the results, look at the size of the difference between the brown (stale popcorn) bar and the yellow (fresh popcorn) bar. A bigger difference means that the participants were more influenced by the taste of the popcorn. A smaller difference means that the stale versus fresh popcorn didn\u2019t influence their behavior so much\u2014or, in other words, that habit was more powerful than taste. As you can see, in the cinema\u2014the habitual place to eat popcorn\u2014subjects not only ate more popcorn, but they were less influenced by the quality of the popcorn. This is exactly what you would expect if people are engaging in a learned behavior rather than responding to factors that generally influence how much we eat\u2014such as how good the food tastes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p>Now perhaps the people in the cinema just didn\u2019t notice that the stale popcorn was stale. Fortunately, the experimenters anticipated that question, so they asked the students to rate the taste of the popcorn. Here is what they found:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5066\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5066\" style=\"width: 442px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5066\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29195926\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-2.58.25-PM.png\" alt=\"Results of the question, &quot;how much did you like the popcorn?&quot; on a seven point scale? In the cinema, stale popcorn tasters gave it a 2.6, and the fresh popcorn eaters gave it a 3.5. In the meeting room, stale-eaters gave it a 3, and fresh eaters gave it a 3.5.\" width=\"442\" height=\"297\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5066\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 3<\/strong>. Researchers found that students in both conditions rated the popcorn pretty low, and many students who didn&#8217;t like the stale popcorn still ate it.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>There was no statistically significant difference in the ratings between the cinema and meeting room groups. But notice that, if anything, the cinema subjects rated the stale popcorn tasted as being slightly worse than the meeting room subjects did. The subjects in the cinema knew that the stale popcorn tasted bad, but they still ate it.<\/p>\n<p>Are we sure that habit had something to do with this behavior? The experimenters asked participants to rate the strength of their own habit of eating popcorn in movie theaters. Of course, some people didn\u2019t like popcorn much, while others wouldn\u2019t think of going to the movies and skipping the popcorn. The experimenters divided the participants into three groups, based on their ratings of the strength of their popcorn-at-the-movies habit. Here is what they found for the subjects in the cinema condition:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5067\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5067\" style=\"width: 381px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5067\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/29200137\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-3.01.07-PM.png\" alt=\"Bar graph showing popcorn eating habit strength of weak, medium, or strong on the x-axis and the percentage of popcorn eaten on the y-axis. Those with weak habits ate 45% of the stale popcorn and 70% fresh. With medium habits, they ate 50% of the stale and 60% of the fresh. And those with strong habits ate 65% of the stale and 60% of the fresh.\" width=\"381\" height=\"295\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5067\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 4<\/strong>. This shows those with either weak, medium, or strong popcorn-eating habits, and how much they ate in the cinema condition. Those with weak popcorn habits still ate a lot of fresh popcorn (the most, even!), but they ate the least amount of stale popcorn.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>On average, the three groups ate about the same amount of popcorn. But\u2014once again\u2014notice the difference between the brown (stale) and yellow (fresh) bars. Participants with weak movie-popcorn habits ate a lot of the fresh popcorn, but not much of the stale popcorn. The stale-fresh difference was smaller for the medium movie-popcorn habit group. And, for the students with a strong movie-popcorn habit, there was no significant difference in the amount of fresh versus stale popcorn consumed (with slightly more stale popcorn than fresh actually eaten!). The students with strong habits knew that the stale popcorn was nasty, but they still ate it as if it were fresh.<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox tryIt\">What do you think happened in the meeting room? You already know that they ate less popcorn in general, and that they ate less stale popcorn than fresh. But did habit strength affect them as much as it did for the folks in the cinema? Make your prediction using the bars below.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/oerfiles\/Psychology\/interactives\/habits3.html\" width=\"830\" height=\"480\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><button class=\"show-answer show-answer-button collapsed\" data-target=\"q446133\">Click here to see the results.<\/button><\/p>\n<div id=\"q446133\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-5069 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/855\/2018\/03\/30033103\/Screen-Shot-2018-10-29-at-10.30.32-PM-300x239.png\" alt=\"Bar graph showing the meeting room condition and habit strength. When the popcorn was stale, those with weak habits ate 15% of the stale popcorn and over 30% of the fresh. Those with medium habits ate 20% of the stale and nearly 40% of the fresh popcorn. Those with strong habits ate 25% of the stale and 45% of the fresh popcorn.\" width=\"300\" height=\"239\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Students with stronger cinema-popcorn habits did eat slightly more popcorn overall than those with weaker habits, but look at the DIFFERENCE between the two bars at each habit level. At all three habit strengths, participants ate about the same amount LESS stale popcorn than fresh. This is the sort of thing that people do when they are aware of the food they are eating. If something tastes good, you eat it. If something tastes bad, you leave it in the box.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p>These results are consistent with the idea that the cinema environment triggers the popcorn-eating habit. The habitual popcorn eater consumes popcorn in the triggering environment (here, the cinema setting) even if the popcorn is not worth eating. In a different environment (the meeting room) the habit is not triggered, so popcorn consumption is much more determined by its quality, regardless of the strength of that habit in the cinema setting.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"before-footnotes clear\" \/><div class=\"footnotes\"><ol><li id=\"footnote-1321-1\">According to research reported in Stanford Business, 20% of theater revenue comes from food sales, but a whopping 40% of profits come from food. They suggest that the high price of these snacks helps keep ticket prices down. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gsb.stanford.edu\/insights\/why-does-movie-popcorn-cost-so-much\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.gsb.stanford.edu\/insights\/why-does-movie-popcorn-cost-so-much<\/a> <a href=\"#return-footnote-1321-1\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 1\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-1321-2\">David T. Neal, Wendy Wood, Mengju Wu, &amp; David Kurlander (2011). The pull of the past: When do habits persist despite conflict with motives? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1428-1437. <a href=\"#return-footnote-1321-2\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 2\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-1321-3\">This study was conducted in 2011. Habits change as social conventions change, so we can\u2019t guarantee that the USC cinema is still a popular attraction on campus. <a href=\"#return-footnote-1321-3\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 3\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":20,"menu_order":29,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"Psychology in Real Life: Habits\",\"author\":\"Patrick Carroll for Lumen Learning\",\"organization\":\"Lumen Learning\",\"url\":\"\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\" Popcorn in a box\",\"author\":\"Dbreen\",\"organization\":\"Good Free Photos\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.goodfreephotos.com\/food\/popcorn-in-box.jpg.php\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc0\",\"license_terms\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"original\",\"description\":\"Toyogeki-Movie\",\"author\":\"hashi photo\",\"organization\":\"Wikimedia\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Toyogeki-Movie_Toyooka002.jpg\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by-sa\",\"license_terms\":\"\"}]","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"part":1292,"module-header":"learn_it","content_attributions":[{"type":"original","description":"Psychology in Real Life: Habits","author":"Patrick Carroll for Lumen Learning","organization":"Lumen Learning","url":"","project":"","license":"cc-by","license_terms":""},{"type":"cc","description":" Popcorn in a box","author":"Dbreen","organization":"Good Free Photos","url":"https:\/\/www.goodfreephotos.com\/food\/popcorn-in-box.jpg.php","project":"","license":"cc0","license_terms":""},{"type":"original","description":"Toyogeki-Movie","author":"hashi photo","organization":"Wikimedia","url":"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Toyogeki-Movie_Toyooka002.jpg","project":"","license":"cc-by-sa","license_terms":""}],"internal_book_links":[],"video_content":null,"cc_video_embed_content":{"cc_scripts":"","media_targets":[]},"try_it_collection":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1321"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1321\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6747,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1321\/revisions\/6747"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/1292"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1321\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=1321"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1321"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}