{"id":1165,"date":"2023-03-31T17:37:21","date_gmt":"2023-03-31T17:37:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/chapter\/neo-freudians-adler-erikson-jung-and-horney\/"},"modified":"2026-01-12T16:44:06","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T16:44:06","slug":"neo-freudians-adler-erikson-jung-and-horney","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/chapter\/neo-freudians-adler-erikson-jung-and-horney\/","title":{"raw":"Psychodynamic Approaches to Personality: Learn It 5\u2014Neo-Freudians: Adler and Erikson","rendered":"Psychodynamic Approaches to Personality: Learn It 5\u2014Neo-Freudians: Adler and Erikson"},"content":{"raw":"[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"244\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/902\/2015\/02\/23225013\/CNX_Psych_11_03_Adler.jpg\" alt=\"An illustration shows Alfred Adler.\" width=\"244\" height=\"273\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> <strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. Alfred Adler proposed the concept of the inferiority complex.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<h2>Neo-Freudian Theorists<\/h2>\r\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">Freud attracted many followers who modified his ideas to create new theories about personality. These theorists, referred to as <strong>neo-Freudians<\/strong>, generally agreed with Freud that childhood experiences matter but deemphasized sex, focusing more on the social environment and effects of culture on personality. Four notable neo-Freudians include Alfred Adler, Erik Erikson, Carl Jung, and Karen Horney.<\/p>\r\n<section data-depth=\"1\">\r\n<h3>Alfred Adler<\/h3>\r\n<p>Alfred Adler, a colleague of Freud\u2019s and the first president of the Vienna Psychoanalytical Society (Freud\u2019s inner circle of colleagues), was the first major theorist to break away from Freud. He subsequently founded a school of psychology called <strong>individual psychology<\/strong>, which focuses on our drive to compensate for feelings of inferiority. Adler (1937, 1956) proposed the concept of the <strong>inferiority complex<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n<section class=\"textbox keyTakeaway\">\r\n<h3>Adler and the inferiority complex<\/h3>\r\n<p>An <strong>inferiority complex<\/strong> refers to a person\u2019s feelings that they lack worth and don\u2019t measure up to the standards of others or of society.<\/p>\r\n<p>Adler\u2019s ideas about inferiority represent a major difference between his thinking and Freud\u2019s. Freud believed that we are motivated by sexual and aggressive urges, but Adler (1930, 1961) believed that feelings of inferiority in childhood are what drive people to attempt to gain superiority and that this striving is the force behind all of our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.<\/p>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<p>Adler also believed in the importance of social connections, seeing childhood development emerging through social development rather than the sexual stages Freud outlined. Adler noted the interrelatedness of humanity and the need to work together for the betterment of all. He said, \u201cThe happiness of mankind lies in working together, in living as if each individual had set himself the task of contributing to the common welfare\u201d (Adler, 1964, p. 255) with the main goal of psychology being \u201cto recognize the equal rights and equality of others\u201d (Adler, 1961, p. 691).<\/p>\r\n<p>With these ideas, Adler identified three fundamental social tasks that all of us must experience:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li>occupational tasks (careers),<\/li>\r\n\t<li>societal tasks (friendship), and<\/li>\r\n\t<li>love tasks (finding an intimate partner for a long-term relationship).<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>Rather than focus on sexual or aggressive motives for behavior as Freud did, Adler focused on social motives. He also emphasized conscious rather than unconscious motivation, since he believed that the three fundamental social tasks are explicitly known and pursued. That is not to say that Adler did not also believe in unconscious processes\u2014he did\u2014but he felt that conscious processes were more important.<\/p>\r\n<h4>Birth Order and Personality<\/h4>\r\n<p>One of Adler\u2019s major contributions to personality psychology was the idea that our birth order shapes our personality. He proposed that older siblings, who start out as the focus of their parents\u2019 attention but must share that attention once a new child joins the family, compensate by becoming overachievers. The youngest children, according to Adler, may be spoiled, leaving the middle child with the opportunity to minimize the negative dynamics of the youngest and oldest children.<\/p>\r\n<p>Despite popular attention, research has not conclusively confirmed Adler\u2019s hypotheses about birth order. Large-sample studies have found no associations between birth order and personality traits such as life satisfaction, trust, risk taking, patience, or political orientation.[footnote]Rohrer, J. M., Egloff, B., &amp; Schmukle, S. C. (2017). Probing birth-order effects on narrow traits using specification-curve analysis. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1821\u20131832. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797617723726[\/footnote]<\/p>\r\n<section class=\"textbox linkToLearning\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bestpsychologydegrees.com\/birth-order\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">View a summary of Adler's birth order theory here<\/a>. Most recent research is contradictory and does not seem to support any clear distinctions in birth order behavior or personality. What is your birth order? Do you agree or disagree with Adler\u2019s description of your personality based on his birth order theory?<\/section>\r\n<div data-type=\"note\" data-label=\"Link to Learning\">\r\n<h3>Erik Erikson<\/h3>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<section data-depth=\"1\">As an art school dropout with an uncertain future, young Erik Erikson met Freud\u2019s daughter, Anna Freud, while he was tutoring the children of an American couple undergoing psychoanalysis in Vienna. It was Anna Freud who encouraged Erikson to study psychoanalysis. Erikson received his diploma from the Vienna Psychoanalytic Institute in 1933, and as Nazism spread across Europe, he fled the country and immigrated to the United States that same year.<\/section>\r\n<section data-depth=\"1\"><\/section>\r\n<section data-depth=\"1\"><br \/>\r\nAs you learned when you studied lifespan development, Erikson later proposed a psychosocial theory of development, suggesting that an individual\u2019s personality develops throughout the lifespan\u2014a departure from Freud\u2019s view that personality is fixed in early life. In his theory, Erikson emphasized the social relationships that are important at each stage of personality development, in contrast to Freud\u2019s emphasis on sex. Erikson identified eight stages, each of which represents a conflict or developmental task (Table 1). The development of a healthy personality and a sense of competence depend on the successful completion of each task.\r\n\r\n<table summary=\"A table outlines Erikson\u2019s Psychosocial Stages of Development. It contains four columns which are labeled \u201cStage; Age (years); Developmental Task; and Description.\u201d Each of the following eight rows corresponds to Erikson\u2019s eight psychosocial stages of development. From left to right, the first row reads: \u201c1; 0\u20131; trust vs. mistrust; and trust (or mistrust) that basic needs, such as nourishment and affection, will be met.\u201d The second row reads: \u201c2; 1\u20133; autonomy vs. shame\/doubt; and sense of independence in many tasks develops.\u201d The third row reads: \u201c3; 3\u20136; initiative vs. guilt; and take initiative on some activities, may develop guilt when success not met or boundaries overstepped.\u201d The fourth row reads: \u201c4; 7\u201311; industry vs. inferiority; and develop self-confidence in abilities when competent or sense of inferiority when not.\u201d The fifth row reads: \u201c5; 12\u201318; identity vs. confusion; and experiment with and develop identity and roles.\u201d The sixth row reads: \u201c6; 19\u201329; intimacy vs. isolation; and establish intimacy and relationships with others.\u201d The seventh row reads: \u201c7; 30\u201364; generativity vs. stagnation; and contribute to society and be part of a family.\u201d The eighth row reads: \u201c8; 65\u2013; integrity vs. despair; and assess and make sense of life and meaning of contributions.\u201d\">\r\n<caption>Table 1. Erikson\u2019s Psychosocial Stages of Development<\/caption>\r\n<thead>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th scope=\"col\">Stage<\/th>\r\n<th scope=\"col\">Age (years)<\/th>\r\n<th scope=\"col\">Developmental Task<\/th>\r\n<th scope=\"col\">Description<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>1<\/td>\r\n<td>0\u20131<\/td>\r\n<td>Trust vs. mistrust<\/td>\r\n<td>Trust (or mistrust) that basic needs, such as nourishment and affection, will be met<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>2<\/td>\r\n<td>1\u20133<\/td>\r\n<td>Autonomy vs. shame\/doubt<\/td>\r\n<td>Sense of independence in many tasks develops<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>3<\/td>\r\n<td>3\u20136<\/td>\r\n<td>Initiative vs. guilt<\/td>\r\n<td>Take initiative on some activities; may develop guilt when successes are not met or boundaries overstepped<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>4<\/td>\r\n<td>7\u201311<\/td>\r\n<td>Industry vs. inferiority<\/td>\r\n<td>Develop self-confidence in abilities when competent or a sense of inferiority when not<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>5<\/td>\r\n<td>12\u201318<\/td>\r\n<td>Identity vs. confusion<\/td>\r\n<td>Experiment with and develop identity and roles<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>6<\/td>\r\n<td>19\u201329<\/td>\r\n<td>Intimacy vs. isolation<\/td>\r\n<td>Establish intimacy and relationships with others<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>7<\/td>\r\n<td>30\u201364<\/td>\r\n<td>Generativity vs. stagnation<\/td>\r\n<td>Contribute to society and be part of a family<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>8<\/td>\r\n<td>65\u2013<\/td>\r\n<td>Integrity vs. despair<\/td>\r\n<td>Assess and make sense of life and the meaning of contributions to the world<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/section>","rendered":"<figure style=\"width: 244px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images-archive-read-only\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/902\/2015\/02\/23225013\/CNX_Psych_11_03_Adler.jpg\" alt=\"An illustration shows Alfred Adler.\" width=\"244\" height=\"273\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\"><strong>Figure 1<\/strong>. Alfred Adler proposed the concept of the inferiority complex.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Neo-Freudian Theorists<\/h2>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">Freud attracted many followers who modified his ideas to create new theories about personality. These theorists, referred to as <strong>neo-Freudians<\/strong>, generally agreed with Freud that childhood experiences matter but deemphasized sex, focusing more on the social environment and effects of culture on personality. Four notable neo-Freudians include Alfred Adler, Erik Erikson, Carl Jung, and Karen Horney.<\/p>\n<section data-depth=\"1\">\n<h3>Alfred Adler<\/h3>\n<p>Alfred Adler, a colleague of Freud\u2019s and the first president of the Vienna Psychoanalytical Society (Freud\u2019s inner circle of colleagues), was the first major theorist to break away from Freud. He subsequently founded a school of psychology called <strong>individual psychology<\/strong>, which focuses on our drive to compensate for feelings of inferiority. Adler (1937, 1956) proposed the concept of the <strong>inferiority complex<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox keyTakeaway\">\n<h3>Adler and the inferiority complex<\/h3>\n<p>An <strong>inferiority complex<\/strong> refers to a person\u2019s feelings that they lack worth and don\u2019t measure up to the standards of others or of society.<\/p>\n<p>Adler\u2019s ideas about inferiority represent a major difference between his thinking and Freud\u2019s. Freud believed that we are motivated by sexual and aggressive urges, but Adler (1930, 1961) believed that feelings of inferiority in childhood are what drive people to attempt to gain superiority and that this striving is the force behind all of our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<p>Adler also believed in the importance of social connections, seeing childhood development emerging through social development rather than the sexual stages Freud outlined. Adler noted the interrelatedness of humanity and the need to work together for the betterment of all. He said, \u201cThe happiness of mankind lies in working together, in living as if each individual had set himself the task of contributing to the common welfare\u201d (Adler, 1964, p. 255) with the main goal of psychology being \u201cto recognize the equal rights and equality of others\u201d (Adler, 1961, p. 691).<\/p>\n<p>With these ideas, Adler identified three fundamental social tasks that all of us must experience:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>occupational tasks (careers),<\/li>\n<li>societal tasks (friendship), and<\/li>\n<li>love tasks (finding an intimate partner for a long-term relationship).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Rather than focus on sexual or aggressive motives for behavior as Freud did, Adler focused on social motives. He also emphasized conscious rather than unconscious motivation, since he believed that the three fundamental social tasks are explicitly known and pursued. That is not to say that Adler did not also believe in unconscious processes\u2014he did\u2014but he felt that conscious processes were more important.<\/p>\n<h4>Birth Order and Personality<\/h4>\n<p>One of Adler\u2019s major contributions to personality psychology was the idea that our birth order shapes our personality. He proposed that older siblings, who start out as the focus of their parents\u2019 attention but must share that attention once a new child joins the family, compensate by becoming overachievers. The youngest children, according to Adler, may be spoiled, leaving the middle child with the opportunity to minimize the negative dynamics of the youngest and oldest children.<\/p>\n<p>Despite popular attention, research has not conclusively confirmed Adler\u2019s hypotheses about birth order. Large-sample studies have found no associations between birth order and personality traits such as life satisfaction, trust, risk taking, patience, or political orientation.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Rohrer, J. M., Egloff, B., &amp; Schmukle, S. C. (2017). Probing birth-order effects on narrow traits using specification-curve analysis. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1821\u20131832. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797617723726\" id=\"return-footnote-1165-1\" href=\"#footnote-1165-1\" aria-label=\"Footnote 1\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox linkToLearning\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bestpsychologydegrees.com\/birth-order\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">View a summary of Adler&#8217;s birth order theory here<\/a>. Most recent research is contradictory and does not seem to support any clear distinctions in birth order behavior or personality. What is your birth order? Do you agree or disagree with Adler\u2019s description of your personality based on his birth order theory?<\/section>\n<div data-type=\"note\" data-label=\"Link to Learning\">\n<h3>Erik Erikson<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section data-depth=\"1\">As an art school dropout with an uncertain future, young Erik Erikson met Freud\u2019s daughter, Anna Freud, while he was tutoring the children of an American couple undergoing psychoanalysis in Vienna. It was Anna Freud who encouraged Erikson to study psychoanalysis. Erikson received his diploma from the Vienna Psychoanalytic Institute in 1933, and as Nazism spread across Europe, he fled the country and immigrated to the United States that same year.<\/section>\n<section data-depth=\"1\"><\/section>\n<section data-depth=\"1\">\nAs you learned when you studied lifespan development, Erikson later proposed a psychosocial theory of development, suggesting that an individual\u2019s personality develops throughout the lifespan\u2014a departure from Freud\u2019s view that personality is fixed in early life. In his theory, Erikson emphasized the social relationships that are important at each stage of personality development, in contrast to Freud\u2019s emphasis on sex. Erikson identified eight stages, each of which represents a conflict or developmental task (Table 1). The development of a healthy personality and a sense of competence depend on the successful completion of each task.<\/p>\n<table summary=\"A table outlines Erikson\u2019s Psychosocial Stages of Development. It contains four columns which are labeled \u201cStage; Age (years); Developmental Task; and Description.\u201d Each of the following eight rows corresponds to Erikson\u2019s eight psychosocial stages of development. From left to right, the first row reads: \u201c1; 0\u20131; trust vs. mistrust; and trust (or mistrust) that basic needs, such as nourishment and affection, will be met.\u201d The second row reads: \u201c2; 1\u20133; autonomy vs. shame\/doubt; and sense of independence in many tasks develops.\u201d The third row reads: \u201c3; 3\u20136; initiative vs. guilt; and take initiative on some activities, may develop guilt when success not met or boundaries overstepped.\u201d The fourth row reads: \u201c4; 7\u201311; industry vs. inferiority; and develop self-confidence in abilities when competent or sense of inferiority when not.\u201d The fifth row reads: \u201c5; 12\u201318; identity vs. confusion; and experiment with and develop identity and roles.\u201d The sixth row reads: \u201c6; 19\u201329; intimacy vs. isolation; and establish intimacy and relationships with others.\u201d The seventh row reads: \u201c7; 30\u201364; generativity vs. stagnation; and contribute to society and be part of a family.\u201d The eighth row reads: \u201c8; 65\u2013; integrity vs. despair; and assess and make sense of life and meaning of contributions.\u201d\">\n<caption>Table 1. Erikson\u2019s Psychosocial Stages of Development<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"col\">Stage<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">Age (years)<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">Developmental Task<\/th>\n<th scope=\"col\">Description<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>0\u20131<\/td>\n<td>Trust vs. mistrust<\/td>\n<td>Trust (or mistrust) that basic needs, such as nourishment and affection, will be met<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>1\u20133<\/td>\n<td>Autonomy vs. shame\/doubt<\/td>\n<td>Sense of independence in many tasks develops<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>3\u20136<\/td>\n<td>Initiative vs. guilt<\/td>\n<td>Take initiative on some activities; may develop guilt when successes are not met or boundaries overstepped<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>7\u201311<\/td>\n<td>Industry vs. inferiority<\/td>\n<td>Develop self-confidence in abilities when competent or a sense of inferiority when not<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>12\u201318<\/td>\n<td>Identity vs. confusion<\/td>\n<td>Experiment with and develop identity and roles<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>19\u201329<\/td>\n<td>Intimacy vs. isolation<\/td>\n<td>Establish intimacy and relationships with others<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>7<\/td>\n<td>30\u201364<\/td>\n<td>Generativity vs. stagnation<\/td>\n<td>Contribute to society and be part of a family<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>65\u2013<\/td>\n<td>Integrity vs. despair<\/td>\n<td>Assess and make sense of life and the meaning of contributions to the world<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/section>\n<hr class=\"before-footnotes clear\" \/><div class=\"footnotes\"><ol><li id=\"footnote-1165-1\">Rohrer, J. M., Egloff, B., &amp; Schmukle, S. C. (2017). Probing birth-order effects on narrow traits using specification-curve analysis. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1821\u20131832. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797617723726 <a href=\"#return-footnote-1165-1\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 1\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":20,"menu_order":8,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[{\"type\":\"cc\",\"description\":\"Neo-Freudians\",\"author\":\"OpenStax College\",\"organization\":\"\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/psychology-2e\/pages\/11-3-neo-freudians-adler-erikson-jung-and-horney\",\"project\":\"\",\"license\":\"cc-by\",\"license_terms\":\"Download for free at https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/psychology-2e\/pages\/1-introduction\"}]","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"part":1158,"module-header":"learn_it","content_attributions":[{"type":"cc","description":"Neo-Freudians","author":"OpenStax College","organization":"","url":"https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/psychology-2e\/pages\/11-3-neo-freudians-adler-erikson-jung-and-horney","project":"","license":"cc-by","license_terms":"Download for free at https:\/\/openstax.org\/books\/psychology-2e\/pages\/1-introduction"}],"internal_book_links":[],"video_content":null,"cc_video_embed_content":{"cc_scripts":"","media_targets":[]},"try_it_collection":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1165"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1165\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7435,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1165\/revisions\/7435"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/1158"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1165\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=1165"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1165"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/introductiontopsychology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}