Hassles
Potential stressors do not always involve major life events. Daily hassles can build on one another and leave us just as stressed as life change events (Kanner, Coyne, Schaefer, & Lazarus, 1981).
daily hassles
Daily hassles are the minor irritations and annoyances that are part of our everyday lives (e.g., rush hour traffic, lost keys, microaggressions, structural inequalities, workplace discrimination, obnoxious coworkers, inclement weather, arguments with friends or family).

Researchers have demonstrated that the frequency of daily hassles is actually a better predictor of both physical and psychological health than are life change units. In a well-known study of San Francisco residents, the frequency of daily hassles was found to be more strongly associated with physical health problems than were life change events (DeLongis, Coyne, Dakof, Folkman, & Lazarus, 1982). In addition, daily minor hassles, especially interpersonal conflicts, often lead to negative and distressed mood states (Bolger, DeLongis, Kessler, & Schilling, 1989). Cyber hassles that occur on social media may represent a modern and evolving source of stress. In one investigation, social media stress was tied to the loss of sleep in adolescents, presumably because ruminating about social media caused a physiological stress response that increased arousal (van der Schuur, Baumgartner, & Sumter, 2018). Clearly, daily hassles can add up and take a toll on us both emotionally and physically.
Factors such as discrimination, prejudice, and systemic inequalities can contribute to heightened levels of stress and adverse health outcomes for historically marginalized minority populations. Recognizing the intersectionality of identities and experiences, it is essential to acknowledge that minoritized individuals may face additional stressors and challenges that can exacerbate the impact of daily hassles on their well-being. Therefore, when exploring the implications of daily hassles, it is crucial to examine the specific experiences and vulnerabilities faced by minoritized individuals to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Occupation-Related Stressors

Occupation | Stressors Specific to Occupation (Sulsky & Smith, 2005) |
---|---|
Police officer | Physical dangers, excessive paperwork, dealing with the court system, tense interactions, life-and-death decision-making |
Firefighter | Uncertainty over whether a serious fire or hazard awaits after an alarm, potential for extreme physical danger |
Social worker | Little positive feedback from jobs or from the public, unsafe work environments, frustration in dealing with bureaucracy, excessive paperwork, sense of personal responsibility for clients, work overload |
Teacher | Excessive paperwork, lack of adequate supplies or facilities, work overload, lack of positive feedback, the threat of physical violence, lack of support from parents and administrators |
Nurse | Work overload, heavy physical work, patient concerns (dealing with death and medical concerns), interpersonal problems with other medical staff (especially physicians) |
Emergency medical worker | Unpredictable and extreme nature of the job, inexperience |
Air traffic controller | Little control over potential crisis situations and workload, fear of causing an accident, peak traffic situations, general work environment |
Clerical and secretarial work | Few opportunities for advancement, unsupportive supervisors, work overload, lack of perceived control |
Managerial work | Work overload, conflict and ambiguity in defining the managerial role, difficult work relationships |
Although the specific stressors for these occupations are diverse, they seem to share some common denominators such as heavy workload and uncertainty about and lack of control over certain aspects of a job. Chronic occupational stress contributes to job strain.
job strain
Job strain is a work situation that combines excessive job demands and workload with little discretion in decision-making or job control (Karasek & Theorell, 1990).
Clearly, many occupations other than the ones listed in Table 1 involve at least a moderate amount of job strain in that they often involve heavy workloads and little job control (e.g., inability to decide when to take breaks). Such jobs are often low-status and include those of factory workers, postal clerks, supermarket cashiers, taxi drivers, and short-order cooks. Job strain can have adverse consequences on both physical and mental health; it has been shown to be associated with increased risk of hypertension (Schnall & Landsbergis, 1994), heart attacks (Theorell et al., 1998), recurrence of heart disease after a first heart attack (Aboa-Éboulé et al., 2007), significant weight loss or gain (Kivimäki et al., 2006), and major depressive disorder (Stansfeld, Shipley, Head, & Fuhrer, 2012). A longitudinal study of over 10,000 British civil servants reported that workers under 50 years old who earlier had reported high job strain were 68% more likely to later develop heart disease than those workers under 50 years old who reported little job strain (Chandola et al., 2008).
Some people who are exposed to chronically stressful work conditions can experience job burnout.
job burnout
Job burnout is a general sense of emotional exhaustion and cynicism in relation to one’s job (Maslach & Jackson, 1981). Job burnout occurs frequently among those in human service jobs (e.g., social workers, teachers, therapists, and police officers).
Job burnout consists of three dimensions:
- exhaustion: a sense that one’s emotional resources are drained or that one is at the end of their rope and has nothing more to give at a psychological level.
- depersonalization: a sense of emotional detachment between the worker and the recipients of their services, often resulting in callous, cynical, or indifferent attitudes toward these individuals.
- diminished personal accomplishment: the tendency to evaluate one’s work negatively by, for example, experiencing dissatisfaction with one’s job-related accomplishments or feeling as though one has categorically failed to influence others’ lives through one’s work.
Job strain appears to be one of the greatest risk factors leading to job burnout, which is most commonly observed in workers who are older (ages 55–64), unmarried, and whose jobs involve manual labor. Heavy alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, being overweight, and having a physical or lifetime mental disorder are also associated with job burnout (Ahola, et al., 2006). In addition, depression often co-occurs with job burnout.
One large-scale study of over 3,000 Finnish employees reported that half of the participants with severe job burnout had some form of depressive disorder (Ahola et al., 2005). Job burnout is often precipitated by feelings of having invested considerable energy, effort, and time into one’s work while receiving little in return (e.g., little respect or support from others or low pay) (Tatris, Peeters, Le Blanc, Schreurs, & Schaufeli, 2001).
- In what ways does Tyre’s story illustrate the concept of ‘exhaustion’ as described above?
- How does Tyre’s attitude towards the residents of the nursing home reflect ‘depersonalization’? Can you identify moments in the story where Tyre becomes emotionally detached?
- Does Tyre experience ‘diminished personal accomplishment’ in their job? If so, how is this evident in their feelings and actions?
Finally, our close relationships with friends and family—particularly the negative aspects of these relationships—can be a potent source of stress. Negative aspects of close relationships can include conflicts such as disagreements or arguments, lack of emotional support or confiding, and lack of reciprocity. All of these can be overwhelming, threatening to the relationship, and thus stressful. Such stressors can take a toll both emotionally and physically.
A longitudinal investigation of over 9,000 British civil servants found that those who at one point had reported the highest levels of negative interactions in their closest relationship were 34% more likely to experience serious heart problems (fatal or nonfatal heart attacks) over a 13–15 year period, compared to those who experienced the lowest levels of negative interaction (De Vogli, Chandola & Marmot, 2007).