Download a pdf of this page here.

Download the Spanish version here.

Essential Concepts

What is Analysis

• Analysis means breaking something down to better understand it. Whether you’re working with a text, artifact, or idea, analysis involves examining parts, uncovering relationships, making inferences, and supporting conclusions with evidence.
• Analytical assignments ask how and why, not just what. If a task asks how parts relate to a whole, how something works, what it means, or why it matters, it’s calling for analysis. Verbs like analyze, compare, investigate, classify, or infer often indicate that analytical thinking is expected, even if the word “analyze” isn’t used directly in the assignment prompt.
• Effective analysis is supported, not speculative. Strong analysis uses evidence, like quotes, examples, or data, to back up claims. Your goal is to make a convincing, plausible case, not an absolute one.
• Suspend judgment to think critically and fairly. Go into analytical work with curiosity rather than conclusions. Avoid letting bias shape your argument before you’ve done the research or explored the full context of the issue.

Keys to Successful Analysis

• Strong analytical writing requires a focused, evidence-based thesis. Move beyond general statements by asking, “What? How? So what?” A good analytical thesis explains what the claim is, how it’s supported, and why it matters in a broader context.
• Use meaningful evidence to support your analysis. Select specific, relevant details that support your thesis clearly. Don’t overload your paper with obvious or unrelated information—dig into the strongest examples and explain their significance.
• Make inferences thoughtfully and logically. Inference involves drawing reasonable conclusions from evidence rather than personal opinion. A strong inference is rooted in the text and consistent with its tone, purpose, and details.
• Go beyond the obvious and explain your thinking clearly. College-level analysis should offer original insights, not just summaries or surface observations. Be explicit in showing how your evidence supports your interpretation so your reader can follow your reasoning and appreciate the depth of your analysis.

Types of Analysis

• Rhetorical analysis examines how messages persuade. When conducting rhetorical analysis, explore how elements like tone, audience, purpose, and appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) work together to shape meaning and influence readers.
• Process analysis explains how something works or is done. Whether descriptive (explaining what is) or prescriptive (explaining what should be), process analysis breaks a sequence into clear, logical steps, often to improve understanding or outcomes.
• Critical analysis digs into how and why a text or artifact works. Go beyond summarizing by breaking down structure, language, imagery, and other choices to explore how these elements contribute to a deeper meaning or effect.
• Back up your analysis with clear evidence and explanation. Strong analytical writing includes a specific claim, detailed evidence (like quotes, examples, or observations), and a clear explanation of how that evidence supports your point. Organize your essay in a logical structure, such as by theme, by section, or with description followed by analysis.

Synthesis

• Synthesis combines multiple sources to create new understanding. Unlike summary or analysis, synthesis draws connections between ideas to develop original insights, answer a question, or support a central argument. Instead of discussing one source at a time, group ideas by theme or point, showing how different sources relate to each other and to your thesis.
• Use synthesis to build your own argument. As you compare where sources agree or disagree, what evidence they offer, and where information is missing or limited, your perspective should take shape.
• Signal relationships between sources in your writing. Phrases like “Source A agrees with…,” “In contrast, Source B…,” or “Both sources suggest…” show how you are weaving ideas together and guiding your reader through your reasoning.
• Balance source material with your own thinking. Your writing should highlight your voice and perspective—don’t let quotes and summaries take over. Aim for original interpretation supported by selective, well-integrated evidence.

Glossary

analysis

the process of breaking something down into parts to better understand it, uncover relationships, identify causes or assumptions, and draw conclusions supported by evidence—often combined with interpretation and evaluation in college assignments

analytical thesis statement

a focused, arguable statement that answers three key questions—what is the claim, how is it supported, and so what does it mean—used to guide an analytical essay by interpreting and explaining the deeper significance of a subject, such as a text, image, or event

critical analysis

the process of closely examining and interpreting a text, film, or other work by breaking it down into parts to understand how its elements—like language, structure, and imagery—contribute to its meaning, message, or impact

descriptive process analysis

a type of process analysis that explains how something is or was done, often to inform or explore a process for curious readers, students, or researchers—commonly found in essays, articles, or educational content

inference

the process of drawing a logical conclusion based on evidence and reasoning rather than direct statements—often requiring readers to “read between the lines” to understand implied ideas, main points, or meanings in a text

prescriptive process analysis

a type of process analysis that explains how something should be done, offering step-by-step guidance for users, technicians, or decision-makers—commonly used in manuals, tutorials, or instructional guides

process analysis

a type of analytical writing that examines how a process works in order to evaluate its effectiveness and suggest improvements—commonly used in technical, business, or workplace settings

process essay

a type of writing that explains how to do something or how something happens, using clear, step-by-step instructions or guidance to help the reader understand or complete a process

rhetoric

the art of effective and persuasive communication, involving thoughtful choices about audience, purpose, and voice to shape how ideas are expressed and received

rhetorical analysis

the process of examining how an author or speaker uses language, structure, and other elements to communicate a message and persuade an audience—focusing on how well the message works rather than just what it says

signal phrase

a phrase that introduces outside sources material that will be quoted or paraphrased

suspending judgment

the practice of holding off on forming opinions or conclusions while analyzing a topic, allowing for open-minded thinking and deeper discovery without bias

synthesis

the process of combining ideas from multiple sources to create new insights, arguments, or perspectives—different from analysis (which breaks things down) and summary (which condenses information)