{"id":750,"date":"2025-06-20T17:10:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-20T17:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=750"},"modified":"2025-09-10T14:29:44","modified_gmt":"2025-09-10T14:29:44","slug":"numerical-integration-methods-learn-it-2","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/chapter\/numerical-integration-methods-learn-it-2\/","title":{"raw":"Numerical Integration Methods: Learn It 2","rendered":"Numerical Integration Methods: Learn It 2"},"content":{"raw":"<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Trapezoidal Rule<\/h2>\r\nSometimes rectangles aren't the best shape for approximating the area under a curve. What if we used trapezoids instead? This often gives us better approximations, especially when the function has significant curvature.\r\n\r\n<section class=\"textbox questionHelp\" aria-label=\"Question Help\"><strong>Why do trapezoids work better?<\/strong>\u00a0Rectangles create \"steps\" that miss curved portions of the function. Trapezoids follow the curve more closely by connecting function values with straight lines.<\/section>In Figure 2, the area beneath the curve is approximated by trapezoids rather than by rectangles.\r\n<figure id=\"CNX_Calc_Figure_07_06_002\"><figcaption><\/figcaption>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"487\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4175\/2019\/04\/11233834\/CNX_Calc_Figure_07_06_002.jpg\" alt=\"This figure is a graph of a non-negative function in the first quadrant. The function increases and decreases. The quadrant is divided into a grid. Beginning on the x-axis at the point labeled a = x sub 0, there are trapezoids shaded whose heights are approximately the height of the curve. The x-axis is scaled by increments of a = x sub 0, x sub 1, x sub 2, x sub 3, and b = x sub 4.\" width=\"487\" height=\"286\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> Figure 2. Trapezoids may be used to approximate the area under a curve, hence approximating the definite integral.[\/caption]<\/figure>\r\n<h3>How the Trapezoidal Rule Works<\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">The trapezoidal rule approximates the area under a curve by dividing the region into trapezoids instead of rectangles. Each subinterval has equal width [latex]\\Delta x[\/latex], and the \"height\" of each trapezoid is [latex]\\Delta x[\/latex] (measured horizontally). The parallel bases have lengths [latex]f(x_i)[\/latex] and [latex]f(x_{i+1})[\/latex].<\/p>\r\n\r\n<section class=\"textbox recall\" aria-label=\"Recall\">You'll need the trapezoid area formula to calculate each piece:For a trapezoid with height [latex]h[\/latex] and parallel bases of lengths [latex]b_1[\/latex] and [latex]b_2[\/latex], the area is [latex]\\text{Area} = \\frac{1}{2}h(b_1 + b_2)[\/latex].<\/section>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">Let's work through how we get the trapezoidal rule formula. Consider the first few trapezoids:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>First trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_0) + f(x_1))[\/latex]<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Second trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_1) + f(x_2))[\/latex]<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Third trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_2) + f(x_3))[\/latex]<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Fourth trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_3) + f(x_4))[\/latex]<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">When we add up all the trapezoid areas:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\" style=\"text-align: center;\">[latex]\\int_a^b f(x),dx \\approx \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_0) + f(x_1)) + \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_1) + f(x_2)) + \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_2) + f(x_3)) + \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_3) + f(x_4))[\/latex]<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">Now here's the key insight: factor out [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x[\/latex] and combine like terms:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\" style=\"text-align: center;\">[latex]\\int_a^b f(x),dx \\approx \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_0) + 2f(x_1) + 2f(x_2) + 2f(x_3) + f(x_4))[\/latex]<\/p>\r\n\r\n<section class=\"textbox proTip\" aria-label=\"Pro Tip\">Notice that the first and last function values appear once, while all the interior values are multiplied by 2. This pattern holds no matter how many subintervals you use!<\/section>This approach generalizes to give us the formal trapezoidal rule.\r\n\r\n<section class=\"textbox keyTakeaway\" aria-label=\"Key Takeaway\">\r\n<div>\r\n<h3>the trapezoidal rule<\/h3>\r\nAssume that [latex]f\\left(x\\right)[\/latex] is continuous over [latex]\\left[a,b\\right][\/latex]. Let n be a positive integer and [latex]\\Delta x=\\frac{b-a}{n}[\/latex]. Let [latex]\\left[a,b\\right][\/latex] be divided into [latex]n[\/latex] subintervals, each of length [latex]\\Delta x[\/latex], with endpoints at [latex]P=\\left\\{{x}_{0},{x}_{1},{x}_{2}\\ldots ,{x}_{n}\\right\\}[\/latex]. Set\r\n\r\n<center>[latex]{T}_{n}=\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x\\left(f\\left({x}_{0}\\right)+2f\\left({x}_{1}\\right)+2f\\left({x}_{2}\\right)+\\cdots +2f\\left({x}_{n - 1}\\right)+f\\left({x}_{n}\\right)\\right)[\/latex].<\/center>Then, [latex]\\underset{n\\to \\text{+}\\infty }{\\text{lim}}{T}_{n}={\\displaystyle\\int }_{a}^{b}f\\left(x\\right)dx[\/latex].\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">Before we move forward, let's unpack some important patterns you should notice about how the trapezoidal rule works.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>The trapezoidal rule is actually an average: <\/strong>the trapezoidal rule [latex]T_n[\/latex] is exactly the average of the left-hand and right-hand Riemann sums! Mathematically, this means:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\" style=\"text-align: center;\">[latex]T_n = \\frac{1}{2}(L_n + R_n)[\/latex]<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">where [latex]L_n = \\sum_{i=1}^n f(x_{i-1})\\Delta x[\/latex] and [latex]R_n = \\sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i)\\Delta x[\/latex]<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">This makes sense when you think about it\u2014each trapezoid connects the left endpoint height to the right endpoint height with a straight line.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">The shape of your function determines whether you'll get an overestimate or underestimate:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Trapezoidal rule behavior:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Concave up functions<\/strong>: The rule systematically overestimates the integral (trapezoids sit above the curve)<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Concave down functions<\/strong>: The rule systematically underestimates the integral (trapezoids sit below the curve)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Midpoint rule behavior:<\/strong> The midpoint rule is often more balanced. It tends to partially overestimate and partially underestimate over the same intervals, so these errors somewhat cancel each other out.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"975\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4175\/2019\/04\/11233837\/CNX_Calc_Figure_07_06_003.jpg\" alt=\"This figure has two graphs, both of the same non-negative function in the first quadrant. The function increases and decreases. The quadrant is divided into a grid. The first graph, beginning on the x-axis at the point labeled a = x sub 0, there are trapezoids shaded whose heights are approximately the height of the curve. The x-axis is scaled by increments of a = x sub 0, xsub1, x sub 2, x sub 3, and b = x sub 4. The second graph has on the x-axis at the point labeled a = x sub 0. There are rectangles shaded whose heights are approximately the height of the curve. The x-axis is scaled by increments of m sub 1, x sub 1, m sub 2, x sub 2, m sub 3, x sub 3, m sub 4 and b = x sub 4.\" width=\"975\" height=\"286\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/> Figure 3. The trapezoidal rule tends to be less accurate than the midpoint rule.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n<section class=\"textbox proTip\" aria-label=\"Pro Tip\">In general, you can expect the midpoint rule to be more accurate than the trapezoidal rule for most functions. The midpoint rule's error-canceling behavior gives it an edge!<\/section><section class=\"textbox example\" aria-label=\"Example\">\r\n<div id=\"fs-id1165042008447\" data-type=\"problem\">\r\n<p id=\"fs-id1165040682509\">Use the trapezoidal rule to estimate [latex]{\\displaystyle\\int }_{0}^{1}{x}^{2}dx[\/latex] using four subintervals.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n[reveal-answer q=\"44558895\"]Show Solution[\/reveal-answer]\r\n[hidden-answer a=\"44558895\"]\r\n<div id=\"fs-id1165042108930\" data-type=\"solution\">\r\n<p id=\"fs-id1165042108932\">The endpoints of the subintervals consist of elements of the set [latex]P=\\left\\{0,\\frac{1}{4},\\frac{1}{2},\\frac{3}{4},1\\right\\}[\/latex] and [latex]\\Delta x=\\frac{1 - 0}{4}=\\frac{1}{4}[\/latex]. Thus,<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"fs-id1165041788152\" class=\"unnumbered\" style=\"text-align: center;\" data-type=\"equation\" data-label=\"\">[latex]\\begin{array}{cc}\\hfill {\\displaystyle\\int }_{0}^{1}{x}^{2}dx&amp; \\approx \\frac{1}{2}\\cdot \\frac{1}{4}\\left(f\\left(0\\right)+2f\\left(\\frac{1}{4}\\right)+2f\\left(\\frac{1}{2}\\right)+2f\\left(\\frac{3}{4}\\right)+f\\left(1\\right)\\right)\\hfill \\\\ &amp; =\\frac{1}{8}\\left(0+2\\cdot \\frac{1}{16}+2\\cdot \\frac{1}{4}+2\\cdot \\frac{9}{16}+1\\right)\\hfill \\\\ &amp; =\\frac{11}{32}.\\hfill \\end{array}[\/latex]<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n[\/hidden-answer]\r\n\r\n<\/section><section class=\"textbox watchIt\" aria-label=\"Watch It\">Watch the following video to see the worked solution to the example above.<center><iframe title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/4nqKNEy0zlE?controls=0&amp;start=796&amp;end=1007&amp;autoplay=0\" width=\"750\" height=\"450\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/center>\r\n<p class=\"p1\">For closed captioning, open the video on its original page by clicking the Youtube logo in the lower right-hand corner of the video display. In YouTube, the video will begin at the same starting point as this clip, but will continue playing until the very end.<\/p>\r\nYou can view the <a href=\"https:\/\/oerfiles.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/Calculus+II\/Transcripts\/3.6.1_796to1007_transcript.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for this segmented clip of \"3.6.1\" here (opens in new window)<\/a>.\r\n\r\n<\/section>&nbsp;","rendered":"<h2 data-type=\"title\">The Trapezoidal Rule<\/h2>\n<p>Sometimes rectangles aren&#8217;t the best shape for approximating the area under a curve. What if we used trapezoids instead? This often gives us better approximations, especially when the function has significant curvature.<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox questionHelp\" aria-label=\"Question Help\"><strong>Why do trapezoids work better?<\/strong>\u00a0Rectangles create &#8220;steps&#8221; that miss curved portions of the function. Trapezoids follow the curve more closely by connecting function values with straight lines.<\/section>\n<p>In Figure 2, the area beneath the curve is approximated by trapezoids rather than by rectangles.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"CNX_Calc_Figure_07_06_002\"><figcaption><\/figcaption><figure style=\"width: 487px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4175\/2019\/04\/11233834\/CNX_Calc_Figure_07_06_002.jpg\" alt=\"This figure is a graph of a non-negative function in the first quadrant. The function increases and decreases. The quadrant is divided into a grid. Beginning on the x-axis at the point labeled a = x sub 0, there are trapezoids shaded whose heights are approximately the height of the curve. The x-axis is scaled by increments of a = x sub 0, x sub 1, x sub 2, x sub 3, and b = x sub 4.\" width=\"487\" height=\"286\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2. Trapezoids may be used to approximate the area under a curve, hence approximating the definite integral.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n<h3>How the Trapezoidal Rule Works<\/h3>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">The trapezoidal rule approximates the area under a curve by dividing the region into trapezoids instead of rectangles. Each subinterval has equal width [latex]\\Delta x[\/latex], and the &#8220;height&#8221; of each trapezoid is [latex]\\Delta x[\/latex] (measured horizontally). The parallel bases have lengths [latex]f(x_i)[\/latex] and [latex]f(x_{i+1})[\/latex].<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox recall\" aria-label=\"Recall\">You&#8217;ll need the trapezoid area formula to calculate each piece:For a trapezoid with height [latex]h[\/latex] and parallel bases of lengths [latex]b_1[\/latex] and [latex]b_2[\/latex], the area is [latex]\\text{Area} = \\frac{1}{2}h(b_1 + b_2)[\/latex].<\/section>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">Let&#8217;s work through how we get the trapezoidal rule formula. Consider the first few trapezoids:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>First trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_0) + f(x_1))[\/latex]<\/li>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Second trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_1) + f(x_2))[\/latex]<\/li>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Third trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_2) + f(x_3))[\/latex]<\/li>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Fourth trapezoid area:<\/strong> [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_3) + f(x_4))[\/latex]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">When we add up all the trapezoid areas:<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\" style=\"text-align: center;\">[latex]\\int_a^b f(x),dx \\approx \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_0) + f(x_1)) + \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_1) + f(x_2)) + \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_2) + f(x_3)) + \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_3) + f(x_4))[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">Now here&#8217;s the key insight: factor out [latex]\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x[\/latex] and combine like terms:<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\" style=\"text-align: center;\">[latex]\\int_a^b f(x),dx \\approx \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x(f(x_0) + 2f(x_1) + 2f(x_2) + 2f(x_3) + f(x_4))[\/latex]<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox proTip\" aria-label=\"Pro Tip\">Notice that the first and last function values appear once, while all the interior values are multiplied by 2. This pattern holds no matter how many subintervals you use!<\/section>\n<p>This approach generalizes to give us the formal trapezoidal rule.<\/p>\n<section class=\"textbox keyTakeaway\" aria-label=\"Key Takeaway\">\n<div>\n<h3>the trapezoidal rule<\/h3>\n<p>Assume that [latex]f\\left(x\\right)[\/latex] is continuous over [latex]\\left[a,b\\right][\/latex]. Let n be a positive integer and [latex]\\Delta x=\\frac{b-a}{n}[\/latex]. Let [latex]\\left[a,b\\right][\/latex] be divided into [latex]n[\/latex] subintervals, each of length [latex]\\Delta x[\/latex], with endpoints at [latex]P=\\left\\{{x}_{0},{x}_{1},{x}_{2}\\ldots ,{x}_{n}\\right\\}[\/latex]. Set<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\">[latex]{T}_{n}=\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta x\\left(f\\left({x}_{0}\\right)+2f\\left({x}_{1}\\right)+2f\\left({x}_{2}\\right)+\\cdots +2f\\left({x}_{n - 1}\\right)+f\\left({x}_{n}\\right)\\right)[\/latex].<\/div>\n<p>Then, [latex]\\underset{n\\to \\text{+}\\infty }{\\text{lim}}{T}_{n}={\\displaystyle\\int }_{a}^{b}f\\left(x\\right)dx[\/latex].<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">Before we move forward, let&#8217;s unpack some important patterns you should notice about how the trapezoidal rule works.<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>The trapezoidal rule is actually an average: <\/strong>the trapezoidal rule [latex]T_n[\/latex] is exactly the average of the left-hand and right-hand Riemann sums! Mathematically, this means:<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\" style=\"text-align: center;\">[latex]T_n = \\frac{1}{2}(L_n + R_n)[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">where [latex]L_n = \\sum_{i=1}^n f(x_{i-1})\\Delta x[\/latex] and [latex]R_n = \\sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i)\\Delta x[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">This makes sense when you think about it\u2014each trapezoid connects the left endpoint height to the right endpoint height with a straight line.<\/p>\n<p class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\">The shape of your function determines whether you&#8217;ll get an overestimate or underestimate:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Trapezoidal rule behavior:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Concave up functions<\/strong>: The rule systematically overestimates the integral (trapezoids sit above the curve)<\/li>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Concave down functions<\/strong>: The rule systematically underestimates the integral (trapezoids sit below the curve)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"whitespace-normal break-words\"><strong>Midpoint rule behavior:<\/strong> The midpoint rule is often more balanced. It tends to partially overestimate and partially underestimate over the same intervals, so these errors somewhat cancel each other out.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<figure style=\"width: 975px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/courses-images\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4175\/2019\/04\/11233837\/CNX_Calc_Figure_07_06_003.jpg\" alt=\"This figure has two graphs, both of the same non-negative function in the first quadrant. The function increases and decreases. The quadrant is divided into a grid. The first graph, beginning on the x-axis at the point labeled a = x sub 0, there are trapezoids shaded whose heights are approximately the height of the curve. The x-axis is scaled by increments of a = x sub 0, xsub1, x sub 2, x sub 3, and b = x sub 4. The second graph has on the x-axis at the point labeled a = x sub 0. There are rectangles shaded whose heights are approximately the height of the curve. The x-axis is scaled by increments of m sub 1, x sub 1, m sub 2, x sub 2, m sub 3, x sub 3, m sub 4 and b = x sub 4.\" width=\"975\" height=\"286\" data-media-type=\"image\/jpeg\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 3. The trapezoidal rule tends to be less accurate than the midpoint rule.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<section class=\"textbox proTip\" aria-label=\"Pro Tip\">In general, you can expect the midpoint rule to be more accurate than the trapezoidal rule for most functions. The midpoint rule&#8217;s error-canceling behavior gives it an edge!<\/section>\n<section class=\"textbox example\" aria-label=\"Example\">\n<div id=\"fs-id1165042008447\" data-type=\"problem\">\n<p id=\"fs-id1165040682509\">Use the trapezoidal rule to estimate [latex]{\\displaystyle\\int }_{0}^{1}{x}^{2}dx[\/latex] using four subintervals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"qa-wrapper\" style=\"display: block\"><button class=\"show-answer show-answer-button collapsed\" data-target=\"q44558895\">Show Solution<\/button><\/p>\n<div id=\"q44558895\" class=\"hidden-answer\" style=\"display: none\">\n<div id=\"fs-id1165042108930\" data-type=\"solution\">\n<p id=\"fs-id1165042108932\">The endpoints of the subintervals consist of elements of the set [latex]P=\\left\\{0,\\frac{1}{4},\\frac{1}{2},\\frac{3}{4},1\\right\\}[\/latex] and [latex]\\Delta x=\\frac{1 - 0}{4}=\\frac{1}{4}[\/latex]. Thus,<\/p>\n<div id=\"fs-id1165041788152\" class=\"unnumbered\" style=\"text-align: center;\" data-type=\"equation\" data-label=\"\">[latex]\\begin{array}{cc}\\hfill {\\displaystyle\\int }_{0}^{1}{x}^{2}dx& \\approx \\frac{1}{2}\\cdot \\frac{1}{4}\\left(f\\left(0\\right)+2f\\left(\\frac{1}{4}\\right)+2f\\left(\\frac{1}{2}\\right)+2f\\left(\\frac{3}{4}\\right)+f\\left(1\\right)\\right)\\hfill \\\\ & =\\frac{1}{8}\\left(0+2\\cdot \\frac{1}{16}+2\\cdot \\frac{1}{4}+2\\cdot \\frac{9}{16}+1\\right)\\hfill \\\\ & =\\frac{11}{32}.\\hfill \\end{array}[\/latex]<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"textbox watchIt\" aria-label=\"Watch It\">Watch the following video to see the worked solution to the example above.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"YouTube video player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/4nqKNEy0zlE?controls=0&amp;start=796&amp;end=1007&amp;autoplay=0\" width=\"750\" height=\"450\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p class=\"p1\">For closed captioning, open the video on its original page by clicking the Youtube logo in the lower right-hand corner of the video display. In YouTube, the video will begin at the same starting point as this clip, but will continue playing until the very end.<\/p>\n<p>You can view the <a href=\"https:\/\/oerfiles.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com\/Calculus+II\/Transcripts\/3.6.1_796to1007_transcript.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">transcript for this segmented clip of &#8220;3.6.1&#8221; here (opens in new window)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"menu_order":6,"template":"","meta":{"_candela_citation":"[]","pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"part":667,"module-header":"- Select Header -","content_attributions":[],"internal_book_links":[],"video_content":null,"cc_video_embed_content":{"cc_scripts":"","media_targets":[]},"try_it_collection":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/750"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/750\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2289,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/750\/revisions\/2289"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/667"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/750\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=750"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=750"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=750"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/content.one.lumenlearning.com\/calculus2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=750"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}