Now that we are beginning to get the idea of how the technique of partial fraction decomposition works, let’s outline the basic method in the following problem-solving strategy.
Make sure that [latex]\text{degree}\left(P\left(x\right)\right)<\text{degree}\left(Q\left(x\right)\right)[/latex]. If not, perform long division of polynomials.
Factor [latex]Q\left(x\right)[/latex] into the product of linear and irreducible quadratic factors. An irreducible quadratic is a quadratic that has no real zeros.
Assuming that [latex]\text{deg}\left(P\left(x\right)\right)<\text{deg}\left(Q\left(x\right)\right)[/latex], the factors of [latex]Q\left(x\right)[/latex] determine the form of the decomposition of [latex]\frac{P\left(x\right)}{Q\left(x\right)}[/latex].
If [latex]Q\left(x\right)[/latex] can be factored as [latex]\left({a}_{1}x+{b}_{1}\right)\left({a}_{2}x+{b}_{2}\right)\ldots\left({a}_{n}x+{b}_{n}\right)[/latex], where each linear factor is distinct, then it is possible to find constants [latex]{A}_{1},{A}_{2},...{A}_{n}[/latex] satisfying
After the appropriate decomposition is determined, solve for the constants.
Last, rewrite the integral in its decomposed form and evaluate it using previously developed techniques or integration formulas.
Now let’s look at integrating a rational expression in which the denominator contains an irreducible quadratic factor. Recall that the quadratic [latex]a{x}^{2}+bx+c[/latex] is irreducible if [latex]a{x}^{2}+bx+c=0[/latex] has no real zeros—that is, if [latex]{b}^{2}-4ac<0[/latex].
Since [latex]\text{deg}\left(2x - 3\right)<\text{deg}\left({x}^{3}+x\right)[/latex], factor the denominator and proceed with partial fraction decomposition. Since [latex]{x}^{3}+x=x\left({x}^{2}+1\right)[/latex] contains the irreducible quadratic factor [latex]{x}^{2}+1[/latex], include [latex]\frac{Ax+B}{{x}^{2}+1}[/latex] as part of the decomposition, along with [latex]\frac{C}{x}[/latex] for the linear term [latex]x[/latex]. Thus, the decomposition has the form
We can start by factoring [latex]{x}^{3}-8=\left(x - 2\right)\left({x}^{2}+2x+4\right)[/latex]. We see that the quadratic factor [latex]{x}^{2}+2x+4[/latex] is irreducible since [latex]{2}^{2}-4\left(1\right)\left(4\right)=-12<0[/latex]. Using the decomposition described in the problem-solving strategy, we get
[latex]\displaystyle\int \frac{1}{x - 2}dx=\text{ln}|x - 2|+C[/latex], but [latex]\displaystyle\int \frac{x+4}{{x}^{2}+2x+4}dx[/latex] requires a bit more effort. Let’s begin by completing the square on [latex]{x}^{2}+2x+4[/latex] to obtain
Here again, we can drop the absolute value if we wish to do so, since [latex]{x}^{2}+2x+4>0[/latex] for all [latex]x[/latex].
Find the volume of the solid of revolution obtained by revolving the region enclosed by the graph of [latex]f\left(x\right)=\frac{{x}^{2}}{{\left({x}^{2}+1\right)}^{2}}[/latex] and the x-axis over the interval [latex]\left[0,1\right][/latex] about the y-axis.
Let’s begin by sketching the region to be revolved (see Figure 1). From the sketch, we see that the shell method is a good choice for solving this problem.
Figure 1. We can use the shell method to find the volume of revolution obtained by revolving the region shown about the y-axis.
Since [latex]\text{deg}\left({\left({x}^{2}+1\right)}^{2}\right)=4>3=\text{deg}\left({x}^{3}\right)[/latex], we can proceed with partial fraction decomposition. Note that [latex]{\left({x}^{2}+1\right)}^{2}[/latex] is a repeated irreducible quadratic. Using the decomposition described in the problem-solving strategy, we get