Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2: The Evaluation Theorem
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2, is perhaps the most important theorem in calculus. After tireless efforts by mathematicians for approximately 500 years, new techniques emerged that provided scientists with the necessary tools to explain many phenomena. Using calculus, astronomers could finally determine distances in space and map planetary orbits. Everyday financial problems such as calculating marginal costs or predicting total profit could now be handled with simplicity and accuracy. Engineers could calculate the bending strength of materials or the three-dimensional motion of objects. Our view of the world was forever changed with calculus.
After finding approximate areas by adding the areas of [latex]n[/latex] rectangles, the application of this theorem is straightforward by comparison. It almost seems too simple that the area of an entire curved region can be calculated by just evaluating an antiderivative at the first and last endpoints of an interval.
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2
If [latex]f[/latex] is continuous over the interval [latex]\left[a,b\right][/latex] and [latex]F(x)[/latex] is any antiderivative of [latex]f(x),[/latex] then
We often see the notation [latex]{F(x)|}_{a}^{b}[/latex] to denote the expression [latex]F(b)-F(a).[/latex]
We use this vertical bar and associated limits [latex]a[/latex] and [latex]b[/latex] to indicate that we should evaluate the function [latex]F(x)[/latex] at the upper limit (in this case, [latex]b[/latex]), and subtract the value of the function [latex]F(x)[/latex] evaluated at the lower limit (in this case, [latex]a[/latex]).
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2 (also known as the evaluation theorem) states that if we can find an antiderivative for the integrand, then we can evaluate the definite integral by evaluating the antiderivative at the endpoints of the interval and subtracting.
Proof
Let [latex]P=\left\{{x}_{i}\right\},i=0,1\text{,…,}n[/latex] be a regular partition of [latex]\left[a,b\right].[/latex] Then, we can write
Now, we know F is an antiderivative of [latex]f[/latex] over [latex]\left[a,b\right],[/latex] so by the Mean Value Theorem for [latex]i=0,1\text{,…,}n[/latex] we can find [latex]{c}_{i}[/latex] in [latex]\left[{x}_{i-1},{x}_{i}\right][/latex] such that
Notice that we did not include the “+ C” term when we wrote the antiderivative. The reason is that, according to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2, any antiderivative works. So, for convenience, we chose the antiderivative with [latex]C=0.[/latex] If we had chosen another antiderivative, the constant term would have canceled out. This always happens when evaluating a definite integral.
The region of the area we just calculated is depicted in Figure 3. Note that the region between the curve and the [latex]x[/latex]-axis is all below the [latex]x[/latex]-axis. Area is always positive, but a definite integral can still produce a negative number (a net signed area). For example, if this were a profit function, a negative number indicates the company is operating at a loss over the given interval.
Use the second part of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to evaluate [latex]{\displaystyle\int }_{1}^{2}{x}^{-4}dx.[/latex]
[latex]\frac{7}{24}[/latex]
James and Kathy are racing on roller skates. They race along a long, straight track, and whoever has gone the farthest after [latex]5[/latex] sec wins a prize. If James can skate at a velocity of [latex]f(t)=5+2t[/latex] ft/sec and Kathy can skate at a velocity of [latex]g(t)=10+ \cos (\frac{\pi }{2}t)[/latex] ft/sec, who is going to win the race?
We need to integrate both functions over the interval [latex]\left[0,5\right][/latex] and see which value is bigger. For James, we want to calculate
We know [latex]\sin t[/latex] is an antiderivative of [latex]\cos t,[/latex] so it is reasonable to expect that an antiderivative of [latex]\cos (\frac{\pi }{2}t)[/latex] would involve [latex]\sin (\frac{\pi }{2}t).[/latex] However, when we differentiate [latex]\sin (\frac{\pi }{2}t),[/latex] we get [latex]\frac{\pi }{2} \cos (\frac{\pi }{2}t)[/latex] as a result of the chain rule, so we have to account for this additional coefficient when we integrate. We obtain
Kathy has skated approximately [latex]50.6[/latex] ft after [latex]5[/latex] sec. Kathy wins, but not by much!
Watch the following video to see the worked solution to this example.
For closed captioning, open the video on its original page by clicking the Youtube logo in the lower right-hand corner of the video display. In YouTube, the video will begin at the same starting point as this clip, but will continue playing until the very end.