Growth Rates of Functions
Suppose the functions ff and gg both approach infinity as x→∞x→∞. Although the values of both functions become arbitrarily large as the values of xx become sufficiently large, sometimes one function is growing more quickly than the other.
For example, f(x)=x2f(x)=x2 and g(x)=x3g(x)=x3 both approach infinity as x→∞x→∞. However, as shown in the following table, the values of x3x3 are growing much faster than the values of x2x2.
xx | 1010 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 |
f(x)=x2 | 100 | 10,000 | 1,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
g(x)=x3 | 1000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000,000 | 1,000,000,000,000 |
In fact,
As a result, we say x3 is growing more rapidly than x2 as x→∞.
On the other hand, for f(x)=x2 and g(x)=3x2+4x+1, although the values of g(x) are always greater than the values of f(x) for x>0, each value of g(x) is roughly three times the corresponding value of f(x) as x→∞, as shown in the following table. In fact,
x | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 |
f(x)=x2 | 100 | 10,000 | 1,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
g(x)=3x2+4x+1 | 341 | 30,401 | 3,004,001 | 300,040,001 |
In this case, we say that x2 and 3x2+4x+1 are growing at the same rate as x→∞.
More generally, suppose f and g are two functions that approach infinity as x→∞. We say g grows more rapidly than f as x→∞ if
On the other hand, if there exists a constant M≠0 such that
we say f and g grow at the same rate as x→∞.
Next we see how to use L’Hôpital’s rule to compare the growth rates of power, exponential, and logarithmic functions.
For each of the following pairs of functions, use L’Hôpital’s rule to evaluate limx→∞(f(x)g(x)).
- f(x)=x2 and g(x)=ex
- f(x)=lnx and g(x)=x2
Using the same ideas as in the last example. it is not difficult to show that ex grows more rapidly than xp for any p>0. In Figure 5 and the table below it, we compare ex with x3 and x4 as x→∞.

x | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
x3 | 125 | 1000 | 3375 | 8000 |
x4 | 625 | 10,000 | 50,625 | 160,000 |
ex | 148 | 22,026 | 3,269,017 | 485,165,195 |
Similarly, it is not difficult to show that xp grows more rapidly than lnx for any p>0. In Figure 6 and the table below it, we compare lnx with 3√x and √x.

x | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10,000 |
lnx | 2.303 | 4.605 | 6.908 | 9.210 |
3√x | 2.154 | 4.642 | 10 | 21.544 |
√x | 3.162 | 10 | 31.623 | 100 |